Tools & Wizards About Us
2016download.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

2016download.com

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

479 ms

2016download.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to 2016download.com homepage info - get ready to check 2016 Download best content right away, or after learning these important things about 2016download.com

Visit 2016download.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 2016download.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

2016download.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.2016download.com

1363 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

10 ms

widget.css

8 ms

css

24 ms

style.css

14 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original 2016download.com, 17% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain 2016download.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 167.1 kB (70%)

Content Size

238.1 kB

After Optimization

70.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 2016download.com main page is 238.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 134.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 56.5 kB

  • Original 66.3 kB
  • After minification 64.0 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 149 B
  • After minification 149 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 2016 Download images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 79.5 kB

  • Original 134.5 kB
  • After minification 133.9 kB
  • After compression 54.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 79.5 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 31.1 kB

  • Original 37.2 kB
  • After minification 27.9 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2016download.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (44%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2016 Download. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.2016download.com

www.2016download.com

1363 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

10 ms

widget.css

widget.css

8 ms

css

css

24 ms

style.css

style.css

14 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

19 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

11 ms

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

5 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

8 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

10 ms

counter.js

counter.js

7 ms

t.php

t.php

54 ms

SEO Factors

2016download.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2016download.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that 2016download.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

2016download.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 2016 Download. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: