5 sec in total
287 ms
4.3 sec
417 ms
Click here to check amazing 4 Screens content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 4screens.net
Using 4screens platform and its suite of products, modern marketers create engaging interactive content and real-time social experiences without development
Visit 4screens.netWe analyzed 4screens.net page load time and found that the first response time was 287 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
4screens.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value17.0 s
0/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value2,670 ms
4/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value24.2 s
0/100
10%
287 ms
1913 ms
100 ms
43 ms
147 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original 4screens.net, 4% (3 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain 4screens.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (38%)
7.0 MB
4.3 MB
In fact, the total size of 4screens.net main page is 7.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 150.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 150.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 4 Screens images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.4 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.4 MB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 117.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 4screens.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 117.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (57%)
74
32
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 4 Screens. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
4screens.net
287 ms
4screens.net
1913 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
100 ms
analytics.js
43 ms
site.js
147 ms
swiper.css
202 ms
main.css
291 ms
font-awesome.css
70 ms
addthis_widget.js
94 ms
mc-validate.js
94 ms
output.css
279 ms
count.js
310 ms
modernizr.js
311 ms
angular.js
794 ms
angular-animate.js
435 ms
angular-cookies.js
376 ms
angular-resource.js
394 ms
angular-route.js
394 ms
angular-sanitize.js
433 ms
angular-scroll.js
468 ms
angular-touch.js
482 ms
swiper.js
590 ms
index.js
496 ms
lodash.js
749 ms
app.js
547 ms
config.js
578 ms
main.js
593 ms
engageform.js
637 ms
form-contact.js
673 ms
nav.js
686 ms
period-engage.js
690 ms
preview-device.js
725 ms
modal.js
769 ms
swiper.js
785 ms
scroll.js
787 ms
ng-change-embed.js
842 ms
tap-menu.js
848 ms
fs-scalable-element.js
864 ms
open-modal-youtube.js
882 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
61 ms
engageform.jpg
1044 ms
engageform-logo-small.png
945 ms
engagenow.jpg
1123 ms
engagenow-logo-small.png
944 ms
engagehub.jpg
1194 ms
jquery.min.js
24 ms
widgets.css
29 ms
settings
27 ms
engaghub-logo-small.png
820 ms
engagestudio.jpg
754 ms
engagestudio2.jpg
950 ms
engagestudio-logo-small.png
810 ms
ProximaNova-Regular_gdi.woff
810 ms
ProximaNova-Light.woff
819 ms
iconfourscreens.woff
830 ms
count.js
102 ms
550028.js
107 ms
ProximaNova-Bold_gdi.woff
791 ms
4screens.png
848 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
13 ms
icon-logo.png
873 ms
tv-bg.cc68d5a1.jpg
1231 ms
tv-hand.ac5d483e.png
1026 ms
radio-bg.a1c5436c.jpg
1063 ms
radio-hand.a6a4ab27.png
1172 ms
stadion-bg.8a755fd8.jpg
1089 ms
stadion-hand.7508798b.png
1203 ms
sklep-bg.ca8c18a9.jpg
1018 ms
sklep-hand.8a42a85d.png
1225 ms
retro-bg.12659380.jpg
1132 ms
retro-hand.20858afb.png
1175 ms
brand-bg.8ea43e71.jpg
1203 ms
brand-hand.878aed11.png
1259 ms
laptop-bg-small.b33c1a40.png
1145 ms
platforms-bg.0a48b48e.jpg
1135 ms
300lo.json
108 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
35 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
10 ms
nwkmsltl
53 ms
__ptq.gif
36 ms
intercom.7cc40b8a.js
34 ms
4screens.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
4screens.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
4screens.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 4screens.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 4screens.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
4screens.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 4 Screens. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: