2.3 sec in total
325 ms
1.8 sec
157 ms
Visit 786.com now to see the best up-to-date 786 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 786.com
Visit 786.comWe analyzed 786.com page load time and found that the first response time was 325 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
786.com performance score
325 ms
99 ms
100 ms
100 ms
5 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original 786.com, 54% (25 requests) were made to Hostmonster.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Dsregredir.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (623 ms) relates to the external source Hostmonster.com.
Page size can be reduced by 102.9 kB (38%)
272.5 kB
169.6 kB
In fact, the total size of 786.com main page is 272.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 177.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 786 needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 71.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 71.3 kB or 40% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 786.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (50%)
32
16
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 786. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
786.com
325 ms
home.css
99 ms
homestyle.css
100 ms
home.js
100 ms
registrar.js
5 ms
jquery.min.js
105 ms
home.css
431 ms
homestyle.css
418 ms
home.js
440 ms
jquery.min.js
623 ms
hostmonster-h.png
51 ms
logo2.jpg
46 ms
spacer.gif
48 ms
button-end.jpg
47 ms
webhost-grad1.jpg
88 ms
hm_gradient.jpg
85 ms
gradient-above-buttons.jpg
86 ms
webhost-grad-m-left.jpg
87 ms
logo2.jpg
254 ms
button-end.jpg
255 ms
spacer.gif
268 ms
hostmonster-h.png
470 ms
hm_gradient.jpg
494 ms
webhost-grad1.jpg
471 ms
gradient-above-buttons.jpg
474 ms
webhost-grad-m-left.jpg
477 ms
ga.js
8 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
show_afd_ads.js
15 ms
collect
55 ms
domainpark.cgi
51 ms
hp_sprite.png
256 ms
dsregredir.com
335 ms
px.js
65 ms
px.js
66 ms
caf.js
45 ms
newcafv2.js
6 ms
body-bg.gif
18 ms
header-bg.jpg
18 ms
frst_arr.jpg
18 ms
caf.gif
17 ms
slave.html
7 ms
domainpark.cgi
181 ms
logo1.png
6 ms
last_arr.jpg
7 ms
arrow-4.png
13 ms
786.com SEO score
N/A
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 786.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that 786.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
786.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 786. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: