1.1 sec in total
81 ms
710 ms
292 ms
Click here to check amazing A2Z Compared content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about a2zcompared.co.uk
Visit a2zcompared.co.ukWe analyzed A2zcompared.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 81 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
a2zcompared.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value9.5 s
0/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value760 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.69
7/100
15%
Value13.4 s
11/100
10%
81 ms
170 ms
34 ms
107 ms
67 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original A2zcompared.co.uk, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (258 ms) belongs to the original domain A2zcompared.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 374.9 kB (31%)
1.2 MB
822.2 kB
In fact, the total size of A2zcompared.co.uk main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 734.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. A2Z Compared images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 219.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 219.3 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. A2zcompared.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 96.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (48%)
48
25
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of A2Z Compared. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
a2zcompared.co.uk
81 ms
www.a2zcompared.co.uk
170 ms
cookies-policy.css
34 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
107 ms
jquery.meanmenu.js
67 ms
jquery.ui.core.js
68 ms
jquery.ui.widget.js
69 ms
jquery.ui.accordion.js
70 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
73 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.js
100 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
101 ms
main.js
101 ms
generic.css
132 ms
css
24 ms
default.css
137 ms
nivo-slider.css
137 ms
colorbox.css
137 ms
global.css
136 ms
styles.css
155 ms
eurocookie.0.1.js
157 ms
jquery.cookie.js
158 ms
jquery.maskedinput-1.3.min.js
193 ms
cars-select.js
194 ms
common.js
195 ms
conversion.js
14 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
bat.js
119 ms
header-background.png
108 ms
a2zcompared.png
110 ms
search.png
108 ms
mortgages.png
220 ms
flights.png
184 ms
credit-cards.png
232 ms
facebook.png
114 ms
twitter.png
114 ms
google.png
116 ms
email.png
127 ms
home-buying-guides.jpg
126 ms
home-personal-finance.jpg
154 ms
home-household-bills.jpg
190 ms
home-business-finance.jpg
191 ms
home-travel-holidays.jpg
229 ms
home-motoring.jpg
218 ms
home-shopping.jpg
256 ms
home-popular-brands.jpg
258 ms
0rdItLTcOd8TSMl72RUU5w.woff
37 ms
TttUCfJ272GBgSKaOaD7Kj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
39 ms
collect
72 ms
81 ms
close.png
145 ms
collect
78 ms
36 ms
ga-audiences
17 ms
arrows.png
34 ms
bullets.png
37 ms
a2zcompared.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
a2zcompared.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
a2zcompared.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise A2zcompared.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that A2zcompared.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
a2zcompared.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of A2Z Compared. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: