2.2 sec in total
62 ms
1.9 sec
205 ms
Click here to check amazing Adobe Reader Apportal content for Indonesia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about adobe-reader.apportal.co
Download Adobe Acrobat DC – PDF Reader (Adobe Reader) 16.0. Translating program for PDF files so that you can view them from any mobile item.
Visit adobe-reader.apportal.coWe analyzed Adobe-reader.apportal.co page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
adobe-reader.apportal.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
58/100
10%
Value2.8 s
84/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.05
99/100
15%
Value6.2 s
62/100
10%
62 ms
25 ms
37 ms
76 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Adobe-reader.apportal.co, 58% (45 requests) were made to Cdn.apportal.co and 10% (8 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.apportal.co.
Page size can be reduced by 409.4 kB (39%)
1.0 MB
629.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Adobe-reader.apportal.co main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 685.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Adobe Reader Apportal needs image optimization as it can save up to 30.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 323.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 323.2 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Adobe-reader.apportal.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (44%)
73
41
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adobe Reader Apportal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
adobe-reader.apportal.co
62 ms
comb-22-base.css
25 ms
comb-22-base.js
37 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
76 ms
ouibounce.css
30 ms
ouibounce.js
74 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
73 ms
jquery.raty.js
29 ms
raty-inner-20170329.js
72 ms
jquery.md5.js
73 ms
jquery.expander.js
81 ms
jquery.innerlib_20160413.js
81 ms
search-form.js
79 ms
conversion_async.js
14 ms
jquery.iframetracker.js
78 ms
trs-ader-ta-3.js
79 ms
adsbygoogle.js
4 ms
analytics.js
67 ms
counter.js
61 ms
header_bg.jpg
90 ms
logo_bg.png
88 ms
logo_ja_JP.png
88 ms
header_bg1.jpg
88 ms
texure_bg.jpg
89 ms
top_shadow_img.jpg
89 ms
adobe-reader-100x100.png
89 ms
shdw_img_1.png
89 ms
download_btn_bg.png
89 ms
sprite.png
89 ms
btn_bg_2.png
89 ms
btn_bg_1.png
90 ms
seperator_line.png
89 ms
mobogenie-100x100.png
90 ms
google-play-services-100x100.png
204 ms
aptoide-100x100.png
88 ms
flashlight-led-torch-light-100x100.png
89 ms
clean-master-100x100.png
89 ms
simple-mp3-downloader-100x100.png
128 ms
adobe-acrobat-dc-%E2%80%93-pdf-reader-37-700x437.jpg
126 ms
adobe-acrobat-dc-%E2%80%93-pdf-reader-43-333x535.jpg
127 ms
adobe-acrobat-dc-%E2%80%93-pdf-reader-38-334x535.jpg
127 ms
adobe-acrobat-dc-%E2%80%93-pdf-reader-40-700x437.jpg
127 ms
adobe-acrobat-dc-%E2%80%93-pdf-reader-36-334x535.jpg
1253 ms
adobe-acrobat-dc-%E2%80%93-pdf-reader-41-535x535.png
370 ms
adobe-acrobat-dc-%E2%80%93-pdf-reader-39-334x535.jpg
1313 ms
adobe-acrobat-dc-%E2%80%93-pdf-reader-35-334x535.jpg
1275 ms
adobe-acrobat-dc-%E2%80%93-pdf-reader-42-334x535.jpg
1261 ms
adobe-acrobat-dc-%E2%80%93-pdf-reader-44-334x535.jpg
1545 ms
adobe-acrobat-dc-%E2%80%93-pdf-reader-34-333x535.jpg
1651 ms
bottom_footer_bg.jpg
1271 ms
ca-pub-4478677975127331.js
87 ms
zrt_lookup.html
104 ms
show_ads_impl.js
59 ms
t.php
205 ms
bat.js
48 ms
opensans-condbold-webfont.woff
40 ms
opensans-condlight_0-webfont.woff
1382 ms
collect
31 ms
pla
43 ms
collect
59 ms
ads
304 ms
osd.js
11 ms
8408853074195405225
85 ms
abg.js
36 ms
m_js_controller.js
60 ms
m_window_focus_non_hydra.js
61 ms
osd_listener.js
83 ms
m_qs_click_protection.js
83 ms
x_button_blue2.svg
89 ms
iconx2-000000.png
41 ms
googlelogo_dark_color_84x28dp.png
50 ms
s
33 ms
transparent.png
3 ms
T8Ys39_ecZUP0z5o0qwgiftCx6c5Z_CDv350QIo51NY.js
2 ms
activeview
11 ms
nr-1044.min.js
13 ms
ui
34 ms
396a8a85da
92 ms
adobe-reader.apportal.co accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
adobe-reader.apportal.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
adobe-reader.apportal.co SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adobe-reader.apportal.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Adobe-reader.apportal.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
adobe-reader.apportal.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Adobe Reader Apportal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: