Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

adobebuilder.com

Building adobe homes, rammed earth, green building, adobe houses, and passive solar homes

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

96 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

168 ms

adobebuilder.com screenshot

About Website

Visit adobebuilder.com now to see the best up-to-date Adobe Builder content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about adobebuilder.com

Interámerica's adobe builder-your portal to adobe homes, adobe houses, rammed earth homes, pressed block houses, solar design and green building. Offering back-pacs of Adobe Builder Magazine, Earthbui...

Visit adobebuilder.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Adobebuilder.com page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

adobebuilder.com performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

adobebuilder.com

96 ms

www.adobebuilder.com

210 ms

topstuff.js

59 ms

mm_menu.js

85 ms

counter.js

13 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Adobebuilder.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to S11.sitemeter.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to B12.myspace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (423 ms) belongs to the original domain Adobebuilder.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 123.8 kB (62%)

Content Size

200.8 kB

After Optimization

77.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Adobebuilder.com main page is 200.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 81.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 68.9 kB

  • Original 81.3 kB
  • After minification 67.8 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.5 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 69.7 kB
  • After minification 54.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Adobe Builder needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 39.5 kB

  • Original 49.7 kB
  • After minification 41.9 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 39.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (84%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adobe Builder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

adobebuilder.com accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

adobebuilder.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

adobebuilder.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adobebuilder.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Adobebuilder.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Adobe Builder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: