4.8 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.1 sec
504 ms
Visit agnity.com now to see the best up-to-date Agnity content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about agnity.com
Agnity is now TNS. Discover our Communications Application Server, a single platform for communications infrastructure.
Visit agnity.comWe analyzed Agnity.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
agnity.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value19.5 s
0/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value600 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value13.7 s
10/100
10%
1215 ms
339 ms
24 ms
346 ms
378 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Agnity.com, 53% (25 requests) were made to Agnityglobal.com and 17% (8 requests) were made to Agnityglobal.explorethatstore2.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Agnity.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (27%)
4.5 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Agnity.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Agnity images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 398.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 398.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 631.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Agnity.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 631.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (51%)
41
20
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Agnity. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
agnity.com
1215 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
339 ms
css
24 ms
style.css
346 ms
shortcodes.css
378 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
289 ms
magnific_popup.css
286 ms
jquery.js
497 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
382 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
282 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
312 ms
custom.js
421 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
350 ms
waypoints.min.js
349 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
432 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
603 ms
wp-embed.min.js
425 ms
css
66 ms
style.css
541 ms
agnity_logo_1_lg200.png
332 ms
1-16v01_Agnity_home_banner_slide_3.png
804 ms
1-16v01_Agnity_home_fullwidth_img_row_3.png
537 ms
1-16v01_Agnity_home_fullwidth_img_row_2.png
544 ms
1-16v01_Agnity_solutions_healthcare_2.png
537 ms
1-16v01_Agnity_solutions_healthcare_1.png
536 ms
1-16v01_Agnity_home_fullwidth_img_row_4.png
513 ms
1-16v01_Agnity_solutions_healthcare_6.png
605 ms
1-16v03_home_section_5_fullwidth.png
773 ms
iStock_000036850398_Full-1-1.jpg
587 ms
1602v02_homepage_communication_slider.png
994 ms
1-16v02_home_2_panel_section_left.png
249 ms
16-02v02_agnity_footer_badge_1.png
249 ms
16-02v02_agnity_footer_badge_4.png
250 ms
16-02_agnity_footer_badge_2.png
308 ms
16-02_agnity_footer_badge_3.png
336 ms
1-16v02_home_2_panel_section_right.png
510 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
190 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
213 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
449 ms
lICK3wNa0fY
70 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
34 ms
www-embed-player.js
63 ms
base.js
88 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
42 ms
ad_status.js
44 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
23 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
30 ms
agnity.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
agnity.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
agnity.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Agnity.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Agnity.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
agnity.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Agnity. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: