Tools & Wizards About Us
amrop.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

amrop.in

Executive Search & Board Leadership Recruitment | Amrop India

Page Load Speed

10.7 sec in total

First Response

885 ms

Resources Loaded

9.6 sec

Page Rendered

246 ms

amrop.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to amrop.in homepage info - get ready to check Amrop best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about amrop.in

Amrop India, established in 1995, pioneered the professional and systematic approach to Executive Search in India.

Visit amrop.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Amrop.in page load time and found that the first response time was 885 ms and then it took 9.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

amrop.in performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.095

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.4 s

72/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

amrop.in

885 ms

www.amrop.in

1507 ms

jquery.min.js

896 ms

bootstrap.min.js

706 ms

bootstrap.min.css

874 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Amrop.in, 6% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Amrop.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (54%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Amrop.in main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 130.8 kB

  • Original 167.7 kB
  • After minification 165.4 kB
  • After compression 36.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 69.0 kB

  • Original 855.2 kB
  • After minification 786.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Amrop images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 752.4 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 365.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 752.4 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 564.3 kB

  • Original 664.1 kB
  • After minification 620.9 kB
  • After compression 99.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Amrop.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 564.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (54%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Amrop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

amrop.in

amrop.in

885 ms

www.amrop.in

www.amrop.in

1507 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

896 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

706 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

874 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

10 ms

in.js

in.js

35 ms

easingslider.min.css

easingslider.min.css

563 ms

css

css

72 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

868 ms

style.css

style.css

1090 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1485 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1046 ms

jquery.easingslider.min.js

jquery.easingslider.min.js

1180 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

1148 ms

functions.js

functions.js

1209 ms

userspace

userspace

150 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

444 ms

framework

framework

24 ms

amrop-india.png

amrop-india.png

485 ms

fb.png

fb.png

332 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

332 ms

google-plus.png

google-plus.png

455 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

334 ms

search.png

search.png

450 ms

find-office.png

find-office.png

1658 ms

find-consultant.png

find-consultant.png

3373 ms

NextInEducation.png

NextInEducation.png

5761 ms

leadership-dimension.jpg

leadership-dimension.jpg

1070 ms

personal-governance.png

personal-governance.png

5098 ms

logo-footer.jpg

logo-footer.jpg

829 ms

hEc2G1nliX8

hEc2G1nliX8

148 ms

slider-bg.jpg

slider-bg.jpg

2755 ms

transparent-bg.png

transparent-bg.png

1342 ms

news-bg.png

news-bg.png

3058 ms

capable-bg.png

capable-bg.png

1920 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

47 ms

Dax-Light.woff

Dax-Light.woff

2747 ms

Dax-Medium.woff

Dax-Medium.woff

3233 ms

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

31 ms

layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js

layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js

7 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

75 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

98 ms

base.js

base.js

177 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

46 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

85 ms

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

65 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

67 ms

Dax-Medium.ttf

Dax-Medium.ttf

1790 ms

Accessibility Review

amrop.in accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

amrop.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

amrop.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amrop.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Amrop.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

amrop.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Amrop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: