33.9 sec in total
226 ms
20.8 sec
12.8 sec
Visit ananova.com now to see the best up-to-date Ananova content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ananova.com
Ananova is the Consumer Reports of web hosting – the trusted source anyone can go to for thorough, current, and honest reviews
Visit ananova.comWe analyzed Ananova.com page load time and found that the first response time was 226 ms and then it took 33.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
ananova.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value4.5 s
36/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value1,090 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value8.8 s
36/100
10%
226 ms
2872 ms
336 ms
261 ms
368 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Ananova.com, 12% (10 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 10% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.7 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 974.8 kB (57%)
1.7 MB
738.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Ananova.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 823.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ananova images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 480.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 480.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 447.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ananova.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 447.3 kB or 54% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (51%)
72
35
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ananova. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ananova.com
226 ms
www.ananova.com
2872 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
336 ms
simple-payments.css
261 ms
style.css
368 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
619 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
618 ms
css
2086 ms
dashicons.min.css
2085 ms
css
2157 ms
social-logos.min.css
2056 ms
jetpack.css
1135 ms
jquery.js
1135 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2007 ms
spin.js
2103 ms
jquery.spin.js
4387 ms
tiled-gallery.js
4429 ms
entry-date.js
4355 ms
responsive-menu.js
4354 ms
postmessage.js
4393 ms
jquery.jetpack-resize.js
4320 ms
getgeotrustseal
5150 ms
photon.js
7305 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4274 ms
jetpack-carousel.js
7305 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
7306 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
7304 ms
gprofiles.js
4347 ms
wpgroho.js
7303 ms
queuehandler.js
7303 ms
wp-embed.min.js
7304 ms
sharing.js
7305 ms
e-201736.js
7100 ms
analytics.js
8054 ms
loadtable.jsp
8656 ms
a2hosting.jpg
7027 ms
interserver.jpg
7067 ms
uk2-net.jpg
7066 ms
12800a0e9ee4ae076074dadc4ae9e78f
2610 ms
226242649
8605 ms
liquidweb.jpg
7771 ms
godaddy1.jpg
8038 ms
media-temple.png
8231 ms
fatcow.jpg
8232 ms
The-New-Cost-of-Web-Hosting-small.jpg
8232 ms
1406509_speedometer_mph.jpg
8038 ms
blogging-platforms.jpg
8598 ms
hivelocity-e1444462164688.gif
8625 ms
Twitter-Profile-pic-SiteGeek.jpg
8624 ms
website1.jpg
2469 ms
ssl.jpg
2469 ms
wordpress.jpg
2469 ms
e-com.jpg
2468 ms
VPS.jpg
2467 ms
domainNames.jpg
2468 ms
020b0e94d1532b24263f5ff80f841600
6383 ms
58bc440d45a346825ddab22ccb40a07e
6464 ms
29b69bbf45bcd83dbba7335e33a4f339
6462 ms
9ac88d2d3c9e833bc0943105e47a58b2
8153 ms
IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff
6660 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8xsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
7908 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
8662 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
8661 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
8661 ms
wcYJIEUIwMaAAArwwHdAAA=
85 ms
social-logos.eot
6285 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
8614 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
8613 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
8612 ms
getgeotrustseal
4847 ms
master.html
5994 ms
hovercard.css
2739 ms
services.css
2969 ms
graph.facebook.com
4732 ms
g.gif
3366 ms
graph.facebook.com
5325 ms
g.gif
3097 ms
g.gif
3793 ms
collect
885 ms
player.js
3817 ms
player.css
3307 ms
ga.js
2550 ms
vuid.min.js
2550 ms
jquery.js
1174 ms
ananova.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ananova.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ananova.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ananova.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ananova.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ananova.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ananova. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: