Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

antimarker.com

Antimarker murals

Page Load Speed

9.8 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

8.3 sec

Page Rendered

301 ms

antimarker.com screenshot

About Website

Visit antimarker.com now to see the best up-to-date Antimarker content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about antimarker.com

Antimarker Коллекция продуктов компании

Visit antimarker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Antimarker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

antimarker.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

antimarker.com

1229 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

245 ms

style.css

366 ms

styles.css

501 ms

colorbox.css

252 ms

Our browser made a total of 205 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (195 requests) were addressed to the original Antimarker.com, 3% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Antimarker.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 987.6 kB (4%)

Content Size

22.5 MB

After Optimization

21.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Antimarker.com main page is 22.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 21.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 89.8 kB

  • Original 121.4 kB
  • After minification 102.1 kB
  • After compression 31.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.2 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 244.3 kB

  • Original 21.5 MB
  • After minification 21.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Antimarker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 573.8 kB

  • Original 746.0 kB
  • After minification 595.4 kB
  • After compression 172.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 573.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 79.8 kB

  • Original 92.3 kB
  • After minification 72.6 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Antimarker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 79.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (9%)

Requests Now

197

After Optimization

179

The browser has sent 197 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Antimarker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

antimarker.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

antimarker.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

antimarker.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Antimarker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Antimarker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Antimarker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: