Access antique-marks.com. Antique Marks « Antique Collectors Guide to Identifying Collectibles.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

85/100

10%

antique-marks.com

2236 ms

adsbygoogle.js

942 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

354 ms

layerslider.css

417 ms

css

465 ms

Our browser made a total of 138 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (98 requests) were addressed to the original Antique-marks.com, 6% (8 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 5% (7 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Antique-marks.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 173.0 kB

Original 210.2 kB
After minification 181.8 kB
After compression 37.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 28.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 173.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 66.2 kB

Original 1.5 MB
After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Antique Marks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

Original 1.9 MB
After minification 1.8 MB
After compression 696.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 424.4 kB

Original 501.4 kB
After minification 407.3 kB
After compression 77.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Antique-marks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 424.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Now

127

After Optimization

The browser has sent 127 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Antique Marks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 64 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Antique-marks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Antique-marks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

antique-marks.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Antique Marks. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Antique Marks « Antique Collectors Guide to Identifying Collectibles.

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

antique-marks.com

adsbygoogle.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

layerslider.css

css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

antique-marks.com

adsbygoogle.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

layerslider.css

css

styles.css

cli-style.css

style.css

style.css

foobox.free.min.css

gallery-default.css

checkbox.min.css

normalize.min.css

style.css

jquery.sidr.light.css

font-awesome.css

jquery.countdown.css

owl.carousel.css

mediaelementplayer.min.css

responsive.css

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

form.min.css

greensock.js

jquery.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.transitions.js

cookielawinfo.js

jwplayer.js

foobox.free.min.js

album-default.css

scripts.js

scripts.js

scripts.js

jquery.animateNumbers.js

fittext.js

core.min.js

widget.min.js

embeds.js

position.min.js

menu.min.js

wp-a11y.min.js