5.4 sec in total
490 ms
4.7 sec
226 ms
Visit artscow.com now to see the best up-to-date Artscow content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about artscow.com
Personalized Photo Gifts, Photo Books, Photo All Over Print Apparel | ArtsCow
Visit artscow.comWe analyzed Artscow.com page load time and found that the first response time was 490 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
artscow.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.1 s
0/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value13.5 s
2/100
10%
Value8,010 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.275
44/100
15%
Value18.6 s
3/100
10%
490 ms
954 ms
435 ms
654 ms
5 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Artscow.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Artscow.com.
Page size can be reduced by 425.1 kB (21%)
2.0 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Artscow.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.1 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Artscow images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 216.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 216.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 117.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Artscow.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 117.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (36%)
59
38
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Artscow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
artscow.com
490 ms
www.artscow.com
954 ms
10008.css
435 ms
ddmenu.js
654 ms
jquery-1.12.0.min.js
5 ms
jquery-migrate-1.3.0.js
13 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
12 ms
jquery-ui.css
14 ms
jquery.iframe-transport.js
653 ms
jquery.fileupload.js
1307 ms
156684.css
1143 ms
jquery.memu-0.1.min.js
864 ms
login.js
674 ms
slides.min.jquery.js
655 ms
slides.js
657 ms
outside_theme.css
472 ms
WebResource.axd
854 ms
31.gif
215 ms
icon_fb_s.png
229 ms
icon_twitter_s.png
219 ms
instgram.png
230 ms
icon_shoppingcart_s.png
219 ms
index_logo.png
221 ms
icon_drop_circle.png
221 ms
slides_01.jpg
655 ms
slides_02.jpg
1107 ms
slides_03.jpg
1351 ms
slides_04.jpg
1552 ms
slides_05.jpg
1617 ms
index_main_banner_bg.jpg
1171 ms
index_promotion_banner_01.jpg
877 ms
index_promotion_banner_02.jpg
1111 ms
index_promotion_banner_03.jpg
1344 ms
dot_line.png
1345 ms
icon_create_now.png
1419 ms
title_create_photo_gift.png
1569 ms
index_photo_gift_banner_01.jpg
1570 ms
index_photo_gift_banner_02.jpg
1578 ms
index_photo_gift_banner_03.jpg
1660 ms
index_photo_gift_banner_04.jpg
1799 ms
step_free_shipping_banner.png
1802 ms
community_banner.png
1804 ms
ServerImage.ashx
1805 ms
title_browse_catalog.png
1846 ms
icon_paypal.jpg
1891 ms
icon_visa.jpg
2014 ms
icon_master.jpg
2019 ms
icon_norton.jpg
2021 ms
sdk.js
268 ms
menu_bg.png
2069 ms
grey_footer_bg.jpg
2096 ms
grey_footer_line_bg.jpg
2207 ms
ga.js
6 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
slides_01.jpg
2176 ms
loading.gif
2182 ms
pagination.png
2072 ms
148 ms
xd_arbiter.php
213 ms
xd_arbiter.php
425 ms
livehelpnow.aspx
78 ms
artscow.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
artscow.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
artscow.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Artscow.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Artscow.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
artscow.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Artscow. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: