19 sec in total
6.9 sec
10.2 sec
1.8 sec
Click here to check amazing A Way Back content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about awayback.com
This is weblog of Amrinder Sandhu — a freelance web designer from Punjab, India who runs a small design studio.
Visit awayback.comWe analyzed Awayback.com page load time and found that the first response time was 6.9 sec and then it took 12 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
awayback.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value5.6 s
18/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value3,910 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.3 s
4/100
10%
6923 ms
71 ms
162 ms
261 ms
263 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Awayback.com, 13% (5 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Awayback.com.
Page size can be reduced by 879.4 kB (70%)
1.3 MB
372.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Awayback.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 737.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. A Way Back images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 483.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 483.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 370.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Awayback.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 370.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (63%)
38
14
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of A Way Back. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.awayback.com
6923 ms
style.css
71 ms
mns6tow.js
162 ms
diggdigg-style.css
261 ms
quotes-collection.css
263 ms
jetpack.css
238 ms
jquery.js
269 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
230 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
231 ms
ajax-comments.js
268 ms
quotes-collection.js
267 ms
wdp-ajax-styles.css
294 ms
amrindersandhu
263 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
12 ms
wp-embed.min.js
314 ms
e-201611.js
18 ms
p.gif
221 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
162 ms
SG0Ou07IDhQ
572 ms
f84LymEs67Y
575 ms
KRVhtMxQWRs
593 ms
85040589
480 ms
XVbuk3jizGM
484 ms
ga.js
37 ms
widgets.js
403 ms
__utm.gif
396 ms
player.js
136 ms
player.css
107 ms
ga.js
119 ms
vuid.min.js
115 ms
www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css
131 ms
www-embed-player.js
248 ms
g.gif
40 ms
__utm.gif
120 ms
proxy.html
192 ms
462267970.jpg
291 ms
1.svg
150 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
172 ms
ad_status.js
159 ms
awayback.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
awayback.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
awayback.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Awayback.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Awayback.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
awayback.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of A Way Back. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: