3.2 sec in total
33 ms
1.8 sec
1.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Beautyfoodme content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about beautyfoodme.com
Visit beautyfoodme.comWe analyzed Beautyfoodme.com page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
beautyfoodme.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value540 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value14.7 s
8/100
10%
33 ms
130 ms
36 ms
69 ms
225 ms
Our browser made a total of 145 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Beautyfoodme.com, 14% (20 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 7% (10 requests) were made to 4.bp.blogspot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (761 ms) relates to the external source 1.bp.blogspot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 467.0 kB (16%)
2.9 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Beautyfoodme.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beautyfoodme images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 318.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 318.9 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautyfoodme.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (47%)
140
74
The browser has sent 140 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beautyfoodme. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
beautyfoodme.com
33 ms
www.beautyfoodme.com
130 ms
webfont.js
36 ms
3375562265-css_bundle_v2.css
69 ms
authorization.css
225 ms
plusone.js
78 ms
show_ads.js
27 ms
3226477086-widgets.js
108 ms
css
27 ms
ga.js
82 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
122 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
158 ms
google_top_exp.js
70 ms
header3.2.png
202 ms
wishlistglitter.png
761 ms
001Avrilsxu_crystal_anglepair.jpg
541 ms
action-on.gif
451 ms
IMG_8178.JPG
308 ms
icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
150 ms
badge-01-160x100.png
290 ms
image
341 ms
IMG_7940%255B1%255D.JPG
608 ms
IMG_8068%255B1%255D.JPG
659 ms
IMG_7920%255B1%255D.JPG
658 ms
IMG_8071%255B1%255D.JPG
683 ms
IMG_8117%255B1%255D.JPG
684 ms
IMG_7130.JPG
683 ms
*
142 ms
share_buttons_20_3.png
141 ms
IMG_8182.JPG
252 ms
IMG_7941%255B1%255D.JPG
251 ms
IMG_7911%255B1%255D.JPG
250 ms
IMG_7914%255B1%255D.JPG
251 ms
IMG_8107%255B1%255D.JPG
251 ms
IMG_8146%255B1%255D.JPG
283 ms
logoFB3.png
139 ms
logoTWT3.png
178 ms
IMG_8179.JPG
248 ms
IMG_7966%255B1%255D.JPG
282 ms
IMG_8065%255B1%255D.JPG
295 ms
IMG_7136.JPG
296 ms
IMG_7134.JPG
330 ms
LogoBlog1.png
138 ms
badges-4.png
137 ms
IMG_8030%255B1%255D.JPG
331 ms
IMG_8053%255B1%255D.JPG
390 ms
IMG_7978%255B1%255D.JPG
394 ms
IMG_8031%255B1%255D.JPG
393 ms
IMG_8062%255B1%255D.JPG
390 ms
IMG_8060%255B1%255D.JPG
390 ms
IMG_7135.JPG
391 ms
logoPint3.png
136 ms
logoIG3.png
181 ms
hellocoton.gif
433 ms
myblyOycMnPMGjfPG-DzP50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
134 ms
ca-pub-3091020915542078.js
218 ms
zrt_lookup.html
211 ms
show_ads_impl.js
156 ms
paging_dot.png
114 ms
__utm.gif
81 ms
blank.html
84 ms
logo-16.png
110 ms
navbar.g
119 ms
blogcounter.js
293 ms
ads
306 ms
osd.js
56 ms
ads
282 ms
icons_peach.png
129 ms
platform:gapi.iframes.style.common.js
40 ms
ads
269 ms
arrows-light.png
116 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
28 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
22 ms
fastbutton
85 ms
postmessageRelay
61 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
26 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
32 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
111 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
119 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
97 ms
analytics.js
79 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_2
91 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_3
97 ms
fastbutton
160 ms
fastbutton
180 ms
fastbutton
175 ms
fastbutton
169 ms
231 ms
adj
252 ms
235 ms
adj
249 ms
beacon
229 ms
beacon
230 ms
246 ms
adj
249 ms
beacon
227 ms
collect
42 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
80 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_4
71 ms
postmessageRelay
124 ms
rs=AGLTcCNFg9Lxr6A_1qJE1FafaQPPaU_lFQ
56 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
67 ms
21 ms
0
108 ms
surly.js
169 ms
21 ms
index.html
358 ms
verify_selector.js
163 ms
blank.gif
199 ms
22 ms
index.html
340 ms
verify_selector.js
188 ms
blank.gif
191 ms
index.html
376 ms
verify_selector.js
176 ms
bapi
172 ms
blank.gif
174 ms
ba.html
73 ms
pixel
50 ms
pixel
48 ms
pixel
45 ms
4.gif
200 ms
lidar.js
41 ms
sbhK2lTE.js
108 ms
verifyr.js
66 ms
verifyr.js
95 ms
verifyr.js
98 ms
pixel
201 ms
beacon.js
194 ms
0
143 ms
bg.png
151 ms
adchoices.en.png
150 ms
4311.js
137 ms
cTrvNaRi.html
138 ms
dbapi
103 ms
dt
105 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
23 ms
Rejuvenation_300x250_logo.gif
37 ms
Rejuvenation_300x250_bg.jpg
35 ms
Rejuvenation_300x250_logo.gif
44 ms
MommyMakeover_300x250_bg.jpg
78 ms
dt
99 ms
sd
22 ms
box_19_top-right.png
42 ms
ci.png
51 ms
beautyfoodme.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
beautyfoodme.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
beautyfoodme.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautyfoodme.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Beautyfoodme.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
beautyfoodme.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beautyfoodme. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: