2.5 sec in total
140 ms
2.2 sec
215 ms
Welcome to bigrock.net homepage info - get ready to check Big Rock best content right away, or after learning these important things about bigrock.net
Search and register domain names at the world's leading domain Registration & web hosting company. Now get 2 FREE Email Accounts with every domain name. Begin your domain search now.
Visit bigrock.netWe analyzed Bigrock.net page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
bigrock.net performance score
140 ms
79 ms
423 ms
68 ms
11 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bigrock.net, 80% (66 requests) were made to Bigrock.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (809 ms) relates to the external source Aff.bigrock.com.
Page size can be reduced by 444.6 kB (48%)
927.0 kB
482.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Bigrock.net main page is 927.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 381.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.9 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Big Rock images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 126.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 126.3 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 221.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bigrock.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 221.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (23%)
79
61
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Big Rock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bigrock.net
140 ms
bigrock.com
79 ms
www.bigrock.com
423 ms
css
68 ms
fat-menu.css
11 ms
refer_a_friend.css
13 ms
style.css
15 ms
homepage.css
30 ms
z-custom.css
6 ms
jquery.js
29 ms
commonScripts.js
28 ms
cart.js
29 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
5 ms
all.js
23 ms
ga.js
23 ms
like.php
186 ms
getImage.php
67 ms
getImage.php
67 ms
getImage.php
67 ms
getImage.php
11 ms
getImage.php
69 ms
getImage.php
67 ms
getImage.php
69 ms
getImage.php
70 ms
getImage.php
73 ms
getImage.php
70 ms
getImage.php
70 ms
getImage.php
71 ms
getImage.php
73 ms
getImage.php
78 ms
getImage.php
74 ms
getImage.php
74 ms
getImage.php
76 ms
getImage.php
76 ms
getImage.php
76 ms
getImage.php
77 ms
getImage.php
77 ms
getImage.php
79 ms
getImage.php
85 ms
getImage.php
77 ms
getImage.php
81 ms
getImage.php
80 ms
getImage.php
77 ms
getImage.php
81 ms
getImage.php
84 ms
getImage.php
84 ms
getImage.php
83 ms
getImage.php
84 ms
getImage.php
97 ms
getImage.php
85 ms
getImage.php
86 ms
conversion.js
70 ms
innerfade.js
82 ms
__utm.gif
54 ms
wz_tooltip.js
51 ms
footerScripts.js
48 ms
ga_event_tracking.js
47 ms
getImage.php
46 ms
getImage.php
49 ms
getImage.php
48 ms
getImage.php
60 ms
getImage.php
61 ms
getImage.php
61 ms
getImage.php
70 ms
getImage.php
69 ms
getImage.php
68 ms
getImage.php
55 ms
getImage.php
55 ms
getImage.php
55 ms
getImage.php
75 ms
getImage.php
55 ms
91 ms
56 ms
trackjs.js
609 ms
xd_arbiter.php
33 ms
xd_arbiter.php
39 ms
Of-YZRAFweH.js
41 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
36 ms
50 ms
track.php
809 ms
getImage.php
12 ms
content.php
176 ms
xd_arbiter.php
8 ms
bigrock.net SEO score
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bigrock.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bigrock.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
bigrock.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Big Rock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: