2.8 sec in total
374 ms
2.1 sec
335 ms
Click here to check amazing Biology Discussion content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about biologydiscussion.com
Discuss Anything About Biology
Visit biologydiscussion.comWe analyzed Biologydiscussion.com page load time and found that the first response time was 374 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
biologydiscussion.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value4.0 s
50/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value2,130 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.048
99/100
15%
Value15.7 s
6/100
10%
374 ms
144 ms
148 ms
139 ms
128 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Biologydiscussion.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (396 ms) belongs to the original domain Biologydiscussion.com.
Page size can be reduced by 336.9 kB (62%)
546.1 kB
209.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Biologydiscussion.com main page is 546.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 315.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Biology Discussion needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.0 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 159.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 159.7 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Biologydiscussion.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (56%)
48
21
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Biology Discussion. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.biologydiscussion.com
374 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
144 ms
widget.css
148 ms
devices.css
139 ms
styles.css
128 ms
style.css
125 ms
style.css
130 ms
layout.css
244 ms
jquery.js
254 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
246 ms
third-party.js
274 ms
modernizr.js
253 ms
general.js
271 ms
shortcodes.css
377 ms
custom.css
356 ms
adsbygoogle.js
6 ms
plusone.js
97 ms
jquery.form.min.js
396 ms
scripts.js
368 ms
jquery.equalizer.js
372 ms
wp-embed.min.js
330 ms
logo-new.png
18 ms
74-45x45.jpg
15 ms
73-45x45.jpg
38 ms
plastid-evolution-45x45.jpg
16 ms
Photosynthesis-45x45.jpg
36 ms
70-45x45.jpg
16 ms
all.js
71 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
29 ms
ca-pub-0989790830026725.js
39 ms
zrt_lookup.html
73 ms
show_ads_impl.js
73 ms
counter.js
103 ms
ads
232 ms
279 ms
t.php
205 ms
analytics.js
185 ms
pla
73 ms
osd.js
81 ms
xd_arbiter.php
117 ms
xd_arbiter.php
181 ms
collect
69 ms
5041533082481332379
71 ms
abg.js
73 ms
m_js_controller.js
86 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
87 ms
x_button_blue2.png
7 ms
s
39 ms
redir.html
65 ms
biologydiscussion.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
biologydiscussion.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
biologydiscussion.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Biologydiscussion.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Biologydiscussion.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
biologydiscussion.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Biology Discussion. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: