5.7 sec in total
671 ms
4.7 sec
340 ms
Welcome to bodylove.ma homepage info - get ready to check Bodylove best content right away, or after learning these important things about bodylove.ma
Visit bodylove.maWe analyzed Bodylove.ma page load time and found that the first response time was 671 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
bodylove.ma performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value14.3 s
0/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value230 ms
87/100
30%
Value0.954
3/100
15%
Value16.7 s
5/100
10%
671 ms
465 ms
188 ms
189 ms
282 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Bodylove.ma, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Bodylove.ma.
Page size can be reduced by 471.2 kB (50%)
943.4 kB
472.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Bodylove.ma main page is 943.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 371.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.7 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bodylove images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 252.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 252.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 153.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bodylove.ma needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 153.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (58%)
36
15
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bodylove. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bodylove.ma
671 ms
bootstrap.min.css
465 ms
isotope.css
188 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
189 ms
da-slider.css
282 ms
owl.carousel.css
192 ms
styles.css
372 ms
font-awesome.min.css
375 ms
ddmenu.css
287 ms
ddmenu.js
331 ms
cometchat.css
303 ms
modernizr-latest.js
345 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
3749 ms
bootstrap.min.js
331 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
312 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
331 ms
jquery.nav.js
318 ms
jquery.cslider.js
331 ms
custom.js
3789 ms
owl.carousel.js
3791 ms
cometchat.js
3797 ms
css
25 ms
css
39 ms
heard.png
3528 ms
marecherche.jpg
3528 ms
bodyone1.PNG
3528 ms
1.jpg
3536 ms
2.jpg
3537 ms
3.jpg
3539 ms
4.jpg
3537 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
10 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNNE-IuDiR70wI4zXaKqWCM.ttf
19 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
31 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
3489 ms
ga.js
72 ms
home.png
96 ms
map.png
97 ms
buy.png
102 ms
bgrepeat.gif
95 ms
cometchat.png
101 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
bodylove.ma accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
bodylove.ma best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
bodylove.ma SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bodylove.ma can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Bodylove.ma main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bodylove.ma
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bodylove. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: