6.5 sec in total
1.6 sec
4.2 sec
679 ms
Welcome to brik.no homepage info - get ready to check BRIK best content right away, or after learning these important things about brik.no
Visit brik.noWe analyzed Brik.no page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
brik.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value3.9 s
54/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value2,260 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value7.3 s
50/100
10%
1633 ms
26 ms
435 ms
320 ms
1078 ms
Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Brik.no, 41% (52 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 11% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Brik.no.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (46%)
3.0 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Brik.no main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. BRIK images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 897.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 897.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 282.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brik.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 282.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (41%)
111
66
The browser has sent 111 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of BRIK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
brik.no
1633 ms
css
26 ms
style.css
435 ms
flick.css
320 ms
brik.no
1078 ms
embed.css
18 ms
css
35 ms
mediaqueries.css
216 ms
brik.no
1293 ms
jquery.js
572 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
324 ms
scrollTo.js
424 ms
jquery.form.min.js
478 ms
mailchimp.js
531 ms
core.min.js
537 ms
datepicker.js
660 ms
embed-no-jquery.js
21 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
638 ms
js_composer_front.css
549 ms
js
38 ms
plugins.js
827 ms
main.js
650 ms
wp-embed.min.js
655 ms
js_composer_front.js
669 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
390 ms
css
12 ms
BRIK_Videobase_Logo250.png
382 ms
forelesning1.png
870 ms
kapitler.png
844 ms
imac_log-inn1.png
724 ms
imac_arkitekt.png
866 ms
shadow-team.png
367 ms
1hivo2.png
644 ms
1hil3.png
644 ms
1olt.png
762 ms
1nsf2.png
783 ms
basisballport2-184x184.png
810 ms
1ac2.png
966 ms
diabetes-184x184.png
894 ms
dovesmedia-184x184.png
922 ms
1inno2.png
948 ms
1forsk2.png
971 ms
1connect1.png
971 ms
1h51.png
1005 ms
PEksljn1-184x184.jpg
1034 ms
social-black.png
1052 ms
erlendny-184x184.jpg
1278 ms
eBOojoh1-184x184.jpg
1081 ms
8kpcnUE1-184x184.jpg
1078 ms
ga.js
265 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
294 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
302 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
402 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
404 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
403 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
403 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
402 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf
400 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
404 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxlDMrAYtoOisqqMDW9M_Mqc.ttf
402 ms
entypo.woff
401 ms
2709.png
283 ms
common.js
61 ms
map.js
60 ms
util.js
160 ms
marker.js
157 ms
__utm.gif
126 ms
onion.js
87 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
66 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
52 ms
stats.js
48 ms
controls.js
43 ms
transparent.png
34 ms
css
23 ms
google4.png
43 ms
vt
44 ms
vt
34 ms
vt
31 ms
vt
32 ms
vt
43 ms
vt
61 ms
vt
43 ms
vt
62 ms
vt
62 ms
vt
59 ms
vt
62 ms
vt
64 ms
vt
72 ms
vt
76 ms
vt
67 ms
vt
78 ms
vt
86 ms
vt
80 ms
vt
90 ms
vt
89 ms
vt
114 ms
vt
100 ms
vt
103 ms
vt
114 ms
vt
113 ms
vt
119 ms
vt
116 ms
vt
126 ms
vt
129 ms
vt
146 ms
vt
142 ms
vt
138 ms
vt
153 ms
vt
164 ms
vt
152 ms
vt
167 ms
mapcnt6.png
22 ms
sv5.png
22 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
12 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
19 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
21 ms
tmapctrl.png
18 ms
tmapctrl4.png
19 ms
google_white5.png
18 ms
vt
158 ms
vt
150 ms
vt
152 ms
vt
157 ms
vt
146 ms
vt
168 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
265 ms
brik.no accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
brik.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
brik.no SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brik.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Brik.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
brik.no
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of BRIK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: