Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

bristolpost.com

bristolpost.com - This website is for sale! - bristolpost Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

515 ms

bristolpost.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bristolpost content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bristolpost.com

This website is for sale! bristolpost.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, bristolpost.co...

Visit bristolpost.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bristolpost.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bristolpost.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

56/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.069

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bristolpost.com

1152 ms

bootstrap.min.css

271 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

104 ms

font-awesome.min.css

115 ms

css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Bristolpost.com, 15% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 15% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Bristolpost.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 402.9 kB (53%)

Content Size

763.4 kB

After Optimization

360.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Bristolpost.com main page is 763.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 361.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 22.6 kB

  • Original 28.2 kB
  • After minification 22.0 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.3 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 143.8 kB

  • Original 361.0 kB
  • After minification 217.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bristolpost needs image optimization as it can save up to 143.8 kB or 40% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 97.7 kB

  • Original 207.4 kB
  • After minification 202.2 kB
  • After compression 109.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.7 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 138.8 kB

  • Original 166.8 kB
  • After minification 165.6 kB
  • After compression 28.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bristolpost.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 138.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (46%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bristolpost. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bristolpost.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

bristolpost.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bristolpost.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bristolpost.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bristolpost.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bristolpost. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: