1.1 sec in total
100 ms
770 ms
182 ms
Visit bytafont.com now to see the best up-to-date Bytafont content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bytafont.com
Discover and download hundreds of BytaFont fonts to use with your jailbroken iPhone.
Visit bytafont.comWe analyzed Bytafont.com page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 952 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
bytafont.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value870 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.121
84/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
100 ms
14 ms
27 ms
36 ms
69 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bytafont.com, 52% (23 requests) were made to Static.bytafont.com and 20% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (244 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (73%)
1.8 MB
479.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Bytafont.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.6 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bytafont images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 660.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 660.4 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 595.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bytafont.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 595.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (64%)
22
8
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bytafont. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bytafont.com
100 ms
css
14 ms
bootstrap.css
27 ms
style.css
36 ms
dark.css
69 ms
font-icons.css
55 ms
animate.css
64 ms
magnific-popup.css
63 ms
responsive.css
58 ms
jquery.min.js
6 ms
plugins.js
118 ms
adsbygoogle.js
6 ms
functions.js
35 ms
analytics.js
164 ms
bytafont_logo.png
54 ms
bytafont_logo@2x.png
140 ms
ca-pub-7707411728440856.js
196 ms
zrt_lookup.html
195 ms
show_ads_impl.js
68 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
40 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
113 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
148 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
146 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
146 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
145 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
179 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
179 ms
font-icons.woff
59 ms
lined-icons.woff
59 ms
original.ttf
36 ms
5xAt7XK2vkUdjhGtt98uneLrC4Du4e_yfTJ8Ol60xk0.ttf
179 ms
original.ttf
57 ms
original.ttf
110 ms
original.ttf
143 ms
original.ttf
143 ms
original.ttf
143 ms
original.ttf
142 ms
original.ttf
174 ms
original.ttf
176 ms
original.ttf
177 ms
collect
121 ms
ads
244 ms
osd.js
96 ms
ads
240 ms
bytafont.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
bytafont.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
bytafont.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bytafont.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Bytafont.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bytafont.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bytafont. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: