3.8 sec in total
1.3 sec
2.2 sec
375 ms
Visit cafewriter.com now to see the best up-to-date Cafewriter content for Netherlands and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cafewriter.com
Welcome to the Café Writer Community. You are logged in. Hi, ! (Login: ) Go to Discussion Forums
Visit cafewriter.comWe analyzed Cafewriter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
cafewriter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value17.2 s
0/100
25%
Value20.5 s
0/100
10%
Value7,630 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.202
61/100
15%
Value19.2 s
2/100
10%
1287 ms
66 ms
89 ms
97 ms
90 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Cafewriter.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Cafewriter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 64.6 kB (65%)
100.2 kB
35.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Cafewriter.com main page is 100.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 52.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 259 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cafewriter needs image optimization as it can save up to 259 B or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cafewriter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 62% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (88%)
34
4
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cafewriter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cafewriter.com
1287 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
66 ms
frontend.css
89 ms
style.css
97 ms
diggdigg-style.css
90 ms
dashicons.min.css
103 ms
css
50 ms
style.css
93 ms
thickbox.css
121 ms
front.css
122 ms
share-svg.css
143 ms
shortcodes.css
134 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
132 ms
cafewriter.com
163 ms
style-front-end.css
165 ms
jquery.js
195 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
145 ms
paid-memberships-pro.js
146 ms
mailchimp-widget-min.js
165 ms
responsive-menu.js
164 ms
formreset.min.css
335 ms
formsmain.min.css
336 ms
readyclass.min.css
349 ms
browsers.min.css
355 ms
general.js
346 ms
common.js
354 ms
thickbox.js
366 ms
sdk.js
362 ms
facebook.js
365 ms
wp-embed.min.js
366 ms
analytics.js
132 ms
print.css
87 ms
10312408_10208553435456330_1858523748302410315_n.jpg
97 ms
4A-myfZX6oDr9CtSTkTGig.ttf
348 ms
rapsGf8n-DpRu9kcmAAciA.ttf
348 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
331 ms
sdk.js
222 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
115 ms
ssi-icomoon.woff
108 ms
cafewriter.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cafewriter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
cafewriter.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cafewriter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Cafewriter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cafewriter.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cafewriter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: