Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

chipkin.com

Chipkin Automation Systems

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

379 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

272 ms

chipkin.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to chipkin.com homepage info - get ready to check Chipkin best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about chipkin.com

Chipkin empowers efficiency and control with innovative building automation solutions. Explore our products today!

Visit chipkin.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chipkin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 379 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chipkin.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,720 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.chipkin.com

379 ms

style.css

75 ms

tab-styles.css

133 ms

bootstrap-combined.min.css

202 ms

jquery.min.js

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Chipkin.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to Google.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (647 ms) belongs to the original domain Chipkin.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 866.3 kB (58%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

634.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Chipkin.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 705.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 67.5 kB

  • Original 86.1 kB
  • After minification 78.8 kB
  • After compression 18.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 96.5 kB

  • Original 434.1 kB
  • After minification 337.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Chipkin needs image optimization as it can save up to 96.5 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 468.7 kB

  • Original 705.9 kB
  • After minification 702.9 kB
  • After compression 237.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 468.7 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 233.7 kB

  • Original 275.1 kB
  • After minification 253.3 kB
  • After compression 41.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chipkin.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 233.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (63%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chipkin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

chipkin.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

chipkin.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

chipkin.com SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chipkin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chipkin.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chipkin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: