7.2 sec in total
2.3 sec
3.5 sec
1.4 sec
Visit choice-site.com now to see the best up-to-date CHOICE Site content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about choice-site.com
CentOS上での各種設定やTips、PHPやDB関係のこと、趣味のDIYのことなど
Visit choice-site.comWe analyzed Choice-site.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
choice-site.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
72/100
10%
Value2.8 s
84/100
25%
Value5.2 s
60/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.8 s
79/100
10%
2254 ms
89 ms
320 ms
321 ms
628 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Choice-site.com, 11% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Choice-site.com.
Page size can be reduced by 268.3 kB (66%)
403.9 kB
135.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Choice-site.com main page is 403.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 215.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 337 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CHOICE Site images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 141.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 141.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choice-site.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 73.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (68%)
31
10
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CHOICE Site. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
choice-site.com
2254 ms
css
89 ms
862f32a206f3cef4363ebf2fd227b93e.b64.css
320 ms
widget.css
321 ms
genericons.css
628 ms
style.css
657 ms
colorbox.min.css
332 ms
1x1.trans.gif
366 ms
adsbygoogle.js
6 ms
409 ms
jquery.js
848 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
596 ms
f2761e6bbdda24b18d1591241f2636ef.js
391 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
608 ms
functions.js
607 ms
jquery.sonar.min.js
696 ms
lazy-load.js
697 ms
jquery.colorbox.1.5.9-min.js
881 ms
wp-embed.min.js
844 ms
41eb07c602984b303f8f5bff046c2077.js
880 ms
ca-pub-6687084207544782.js
184 ms
zrt_lookup.html
181 ms
show_ads_impl.js
89 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
185 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nhGYIVA-f1n-gQW6IKoy_-M.woff
277 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6njPY4jw7fdqC-GX3uhj9onc.woff
278 ms
BjAYBlHtW3CJxDcjzrnZCNIh4imgI8P11RFo6YPCPC0.woff
277 ms
Genericons.svg
405 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
74 ms
ads
327 ms
osd.js
77 ms
ads
253 ms
analytics.js
83 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
175 ms
collect
54 ms
adacdda28094ad019a079abaa3b18049
218 ms
d22dcd9f272d4f6a045640c520d6379d-300x94.png
211 ms
paypal-300x188.png
209 ms
choice-site.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
choice-site.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
choice-site.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choice-site.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Choice-site.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
choice-site.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CHOICE Site. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: