2.3 sec in total
844 ms
1.3 sec
218 ms
Click here to check amazing CIF Co content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cif.co.rs
Visit cif.co.rsWe analyzed Cif.co.rs page load time and found that the first response time was 844 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Cif.co.rs rating and web reputation
cif.co.rs performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value15.4 s
0/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.3 s
31/100
10%
844 ms
12 ms
39 ms
58 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Cif.co.rs, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (844 ms) belongs to the original domain Cif.co.rs.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (53%)
2.0 MB
923.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Cif.co.rs main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 894.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CIF Co images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 596.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 596.6 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 369.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cif.co.rs needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 369.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (58%)
90
38
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CIF Co. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cif.co.rs
844 ms
ga.js
12 ms
styles.css
39 ms
main.css
58 ms
plugins.css
59 ms
font-awesome.css
61 ms
modules.css
64 ms
css
25 ms
css
37 ms
css
45 ms
css
47 ms
tutorial.css
52 ms
zilla-likes.css
72 ms
settings.css
89 ms
dynamic-captions.css
73 ms
static-captions.css
75 ms
css
45 ms
bootstrap.css
133 ms
owl.carousel.css
90 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
92 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
94 ms
prettify.css
106 ms
style.css
163 ms
fontello.css
126 ms
picons.css
145 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
custom.css
110 ms
jquery.js
172 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
135 ms
mailchimp-widget-min.js
137 ms
front-plugins.js
194 ms
front.js
164 ms
zilla-likes.js
164 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
188 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
222 ms
comment-reply.min.js
187 ms
cif_logo.png
21 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
6 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
13 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
17 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
14 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
16 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
17 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
14 ms
slider-bg2.jpg
46 ms
team5.jpg
44 ms
slider-bg1.jpg
47 ms
team2.jpg
47 ms
parallax2.jpg
78 ms
team3.jpg
49 ms
logo-unicredit.gif
50 ms
sr_logo_bnp.png
56 ms
IBRD.jpg
56 ms
Snap3.jpg
65 ms
logoMKF1.jpg
66 ms
logo_int.png
74 ms
hypo-logo1.png
76 ms
logo_en21.png
83 ms
CBBIH.jpg
84 ms
logo_en.png
93 ms
bbac_logo.png
95 ms
slika-Privredna-Banka-Beograd-143_800.jpeg
95 ms
logo.gif
100 ms
images.jpeg
103 ms
logo-en1.png
112 ms
logo-11.png
114 ms
cacanskabanka-logo.jpg
114 ms
logo.jpg
119 ms
dunav.png
122 ms
logo.png
130 ms
logo-isi.png
133 ms
parallax1.jpg
36 ms
piconsthin.woff
119 ms
fontello.woff
131 ms
fontello-social.woff
101 ms
jquery.form.min.js
99 ms
scripts.js
107 ms
bootstrap.min.js
116 ms
twitter-bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js
120 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
138 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
141 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
141 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
142 ms
jquery.easytabs.min.js
159 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
158 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
159 ms
jquery.sticky.js
188 ms
prettify.js
188 ms
js
26 ms
retina.js
191 ms
gomap.js
199 ms
scripts.js
193 ms
common.js
105 ms
util.js
106 ms
geocoder.js
105 ms
loading.gif
22 ms
timer.png
23 ms
shadow2.png
22 ms
fontello-circle.woff
22 ms
cif.co.rs accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cif.co.rs best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
cif.co.rs SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cif.co.rs can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cif.co.rs main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cif.co.rs
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CIF Co. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: