7.9 sec in total
1.9 sec
5.6 sec
378 ms
Visit civilblog.org now to see the best up-to-date Civil Blog content for South Africa and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about civilblog.org
Reinforcing Civil Engineers
Visit civilblog.orgWe analyzed Civilblog.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
civilblog.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
1929 ms
74 ms
131 ms
133 ms
138 ms
Our browser made a total of 124 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Civilblog.org, 8% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 7% (9 requests) were made to I1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Civilblog.org.
Page size can be reduced by 564.2 kB (54%)
1.0 MB
483.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Civilblog.org main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 603.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Civil Blog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 369.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 369.0 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 134.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Civilblog.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 134.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (60%)
120
48
The browser has sent 120 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Civil Blog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 52 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
civilblog.org
1929 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
74 ms
styles.css
131 ms
screen.min.css
133 ms
postratings-css.css
138 ms
pagenavi-css.css
136 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
133 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
137 ms
style.css
257 ms
css
24 ms
jetpack.css
212 ms
jquery.js
329 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
220 ms
spin.js
220 ms
jquery.spin.js
209 ms
about-the-author.css
274 ms
wp-tab-widget.css
277 ms
banners
124 ms
all.js
268 ms
infinity.js
276 ms
jquery.cycle.js
398 ms
slideshow-shortcode.js
315 ms
photon.js
399 ms
jquery.form.min.js
399 ms
scripts.js
399 ms
front.min.js
414 ms
postratings-js.js
416 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
58 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
470 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
454 ms
gprofiles.js
58 ms
wpgroho.js
455 ms
customscripts.js
459 ms
wp-embed.min.js
494 ms
wp-tab-widget.js
466 ms
e-201609.js
5 ms
analytics.js
63 ms
Types-of-Piers-for-Bridge-Structure.jpg
405 ms
Presence-of-impurities-in-sand.jpg
46 ms
Selection-of-type-of-foundation.jpg
46 ms
Quality-control-checks-for-brickwork.jpg
335 ms
Presence-of-impurities-in-sand.jpg
50 ms
Quality-control-checks-for-brickwork.jpg
46 ms
Fig-1-Section-of-Well-Foundation.jpg
44 ms
Presence-of-impurities-in-sand.jpg
43 ms
Fig-2-Concrete-placing-for-walls-and-columns.jpg
44 ms
Fig-1-The-Process-of-Concrete-Compaction.jpg
45 ms
Why-steel-is-used-in-concrete.jpg
45 ms
Properties-of-concrete-for-rigid-pavement.jpg
49 ms
Types-of-Piers-for-Bridge-Structure.jpg
42 ms
Properties-of-concrete-for-rigid-pavement.jpg
43 ms
Geophysical-Test-Advantages-Limitations.jpg
46 ms
Properties-of-concrete-for-rigid-pavement.jpg
44 ms
Contraction-joint-in-concrete-what-why-how.jpg
44 ms
bnr-tag_1.0.9.js
33 ms
banners
243 ms
banners
121 ms
collect
20 ms
20160301_015106614_image-banner.cib
111 ms
point.woff
75 ms
show.php
151 ms
collect
69 ms
bounce-tag_1.0.23.js
12 ms
jquery.min.js
31 ms
bnrcore_1.0.30.js
31 ms
jquery.min.js
125 ms
javascripts.js
69 ms
iframe.tracker.js
67 ms
show_js.php
106 ms
rhpop_1.1.41.js
24 ms
findBanner
51 ms
findBanner
96 ms
getjs.aspx
20 ms
getjs.static.js
27 ms
65.css
13 ms
GetAd.aspx
65 ms
65.gif
7 ms
adsbygoogle.js
68 ms
p-01-0VIaSjnOLg.gif
68 ms
visitormatch
69 ms
400066.gif
67 ms
449 ms
ca-pub-6314803801841302.js
290 ms
zrt_lookup.html
279 ms
show_ads_impl.js
278 ms
hovercard.css
151 ms
services.css
158 ms
admin-ajax.php
874 ms
xd_arbiter.php
234 ms
xd_arbiter.php
441 ms
g.gif
107 ms
ads
268 ms
like_box.php
129 ms
osd.js
22 ms
SkKWi5-9qSV.css
232 ms
5qLhvfW20va.css
239 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
342 ms
b94UUzHjapV.js
429 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
365 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
364 ms
10643339693042831197
64 ms
abg.js
66 ms
m_js_controller.js
81 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
52 ms
s
45 ms
x_button_blue2.png
47 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
6 ms
10393568_561601250637946_1175648491622372660_n.jpg
233 ms
1045104_431365340328205_1665108980_n.jpg
267 ms
11892119_528989057255210_8476412533829444458_n.jpg
310 ms
12510478_1712422155659957_8407185564690127313_n.jpg
348 ms
12734272_1570464029911859_691146831870829962_n.jpg
349 ms
10665750_691062307641956_4213897141982508039_n.jpg
350 ms
10308167_752303471567591_5362384862349716910_n.jpg
601 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
60 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
61 ms
Types-of-Piers-for-Bridge-Structure-65x65.jpg
86 ms
Presence-of-impurities-in-sand-65x65.jpg
84 ms
Quality-control-checks-for-brickwork-65x65.jpg
85 ms
Properties-of-concrete-for-rigid-pavement-65x65.jpg
93 ms
Geophysical-Test-Advantages-Limitations-65x65.jpg
78 ms
rating_over.gif
1360 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
41 ms
f6T91Deal_q.js
93 ms
civilblog.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
civilblog.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
civilblog.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Civilblog.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Civilblog.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
civilblog.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Civil Blog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: