2.9 sec in total
526 ms
2.2 sec
215 ms
Click here to check amazing Compare Ji content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about compareji.com
CompareJi.com, compare fixed deposit, bank search, bank, fixed, compare exchange rates,forex,exchange,historical data,historical prices,analysis,exchange,ifsc,micr,branch,india,inr
Visit compareji.comWe analyzed Compareji.com page load time and found that the first response time was 526 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
compareji.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value5.6 s
18/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value410 ms
67/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value6.4 s
60/100
10%
526 ms
275 ms
247 ms
273 ms
264 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Compareji.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (939 ms) belongs to the original domain Compareji.com.
Page size can be reduced by 259.5 kB (59%)
437.7 kB
178.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Compareji.com main page is 437.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 162.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compare Ji images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 109.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 123.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Compareji.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 123.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (75%)
52
13
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Ji. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.compareji.com
526 ms
style1.css
275 ms
mod_pixsearch_ng.css
247 ms
style.php
273 ms
modal.css
264 ms
k2.css
180 ms
system.css
253 ms
general.css
385 ms
addons.css
341 ms
layout.css
449 ms
template.css
425 ms
joomla.css
347 ms
gk_stuff.css
349 ms
typo.css
501 ms
vm_major.css
431 ms
vm_gk_flypage.css
509 ms
browse_notables.css
536 ms
css3.css
584 ms
style1.css
591 ms
mootools.js
615 ms
domready_fix.js
581 ms
modal.js
668 ms
jquery.min.js
27 ms
k2.js
703 ms
caption.js
661 ms
engine.js
705 ms
gpixsearch.nocache.js
778 ms
engine_compress.js
697 ms
importer.php
777 ms
mega.css
748 ms
mega.js
782 ms
gk.script.js
862 ms
EUCookieDirective.js
939 ms
ga.js
18 ms
main_bg.png
93 ms
222227slide1.png
111 ms
540264usd_slide.png
108 ms
883430gbp_slide.png
111 ms
img.php
175 ms
color_bg.png
119 ms
logo.png
154 ms
menu_lvl1_bg.png
179 ms
menu_lvl1_bullet.png
180 ms
submenu_line.png
181 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
loader.gif
197 ms
moduletable_title.png
171 ms
continue_button.png
183 ms
7A1F8D4CF9B3AEDE33A0474E34EB4362.cache.html
275 ms
222227slide1.png
115 ms
540264usd_slide.png
194 ms
883430gbp_slide.png
195 ms
user-tools.png
89 ms
compareji.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
compareji.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
compareji.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Compareji.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Compareji.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
compareji.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Compare Ji. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: