3.2 sec in total
414 ms
2.6 sec
179 ms
Welcome to competitivebrand.com homepage info - get ready to check Competitive Brand best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about competitivebrand.com
Social Media Marketing is all about building relationships. This is done by sharing compelling and valuable content with your audience. Let us help
Visit competitivebrand.comWe analyzed Competitivebrand.com page load time and found that the first response time was 414 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
competitivebrand.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value7.7 s
25/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0.027
100/100
15%
Value7.5 s
47/100
10%
414 ms
35 ms
82 ms
163 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Competitivebrand.com, 19% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (543 ms) belongs to the original domain Competitivebrand.com.
Page size can be reduced by 556.6 kB (85%)
655.6 kB
99.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Competitivebrand.com main page is 655.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 548.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 484.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Competitivebrand.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 484.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (73%)
48
13
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Competitive Brand. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.competitivebrand.com
414 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
82 ms
settings.css
163 ms
dynamic-captions.css
154 ms
static-captions.css
151 ms
css
39 ms
css
52 ms
css
60 ms
css
62 ms
style.css
326 ms
style.css
208 ms
shortcodes.css
214 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
227 ms
magnific_popup.css
224 ms
jetpack.css
295 ms
jquery.js
358 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
289 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
374 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
386 ms
picturefill.min.js
389 ms
plusone.js
57 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
460 ms
photon.js
458 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
22 ms
comment-reply.min.js
459 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
464 ms
custom.js
499 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
498 ms
waypoints.min.js
500 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
503 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
538 ms
wp-embed.min.js
541 ms
count.js
543 ms
e-201611.js
20 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
110 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
67 ms
2-COVER-PHOTO-2.png
56 ms
CONTENT.png
90 ms
STRATEGY.png
54 ms
logo.png
206 ms
BRANDING-4-1.png
50 ms
widgets.js
47 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
36 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
37 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
39 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
37 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
37 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
38 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
37 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
35 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
37 ms
AWM5wXtMJeRP-AcRTgT4qQ.ttf
39 ms
l1cOQ90roY9yC7voEhngDKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
39 ms
dI-qzxlKVQA6TUC5RKSb36CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
37 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
281 ms
STRATEGY.png
23 ms
BRANDING-4-1.png
21 ms
CONTENT.png
46 ms
count.js
73 ms
g.gif
4 ms
competitivebrand.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
competitivebrand.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
competitivebrand.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Competitivebrand.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Competitivebrand.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
competitivebrand.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Competitive Brand. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: