5.9 sec in total
208 ms
4.8 sec
863 ms
Visit concretesealerreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Concrete Sealer Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about concretesealerreview.com
ConcreteSealerReview.com is a help & review site for concrete & brick coatings & sealers, based on decades of experience in application and distribution.
Visit concretesealerreview.comWe analyzed Concretesealerreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 208 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
concretesealerreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.1 s
63/100
10%
208 ms
1492 ms
119 ms
137 ms
130 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Concretesealerreview.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to Intensedebate.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to S.intensedebate.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Concretesealerreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 577.7 kB (47%)
1.2 MB
650.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Concretesealerreview.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 508.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Concrete Sealer Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 309.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 309.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 143.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Concretesealerreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 143.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (73%)
77
21
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Concrete Sealer Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
concretesealerreview.com
208 ms
www.concretesealerreview.com
1492 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
119 ms
grid-12.css
137 ms
gantry.css
130 ms
wordpress.css
134 ms
wordpress.css
130 ms
demo-styles.css
134 ms
overlays.css
187 ms
bodystyle-light.css
204 ms
typography.css
198 ms
extensions.css
206 ms
extensions-overlays.css
201 ms
extensions-body-light.css
213 ms
template.css
253 ms
wp.css
270 ms
fusionmenu.css
267 ms
frontend.css
277 ms
font-awesome.css
8 ms
rokbox-style.css
272 ms
style.css
320 ms
mootools.js
523 ms
gantry-inputs.js
343 ms
gantry-smartload.js
344 ms
load-transition.js
350 ms
fusion.js
388 ms
jquery.js
544 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
419 ms
rokbox.js
417 ms
style.css
456 ms
rokbox-config.js
485 ms
10
177 ms
frontend.js
453 ms
874 ms
dustnscratches.png
156 ms
bottom-divider.png
130 ms
navigation-overlay.png
131 ms
navigation-bar.png
132 ms
menu-divider.png
132 ms
daddy-arrows.png
131 ms
menu-divider3.png
154 ms
HEADER_ConcreteSealerReview.png
451 ms
BrickSealerReviewsDEFAULT.png
154 ms
CreteSealerReviewsDEFAULT.png
163 ms
DecoSealerReviewsDEFAULT.png
163 ms
CreteCleanerReviewsDEFAULT.png
212 ms
aggregate.jpg
465 ms
readon-bg.png
212 ms
paversealing.jpg
290 ms
Stamped-Concrete-Pitting.jpg
415 ms
trans.gif
1178 ms
SuperSeal30-150x150.png
294 ms
SS30_Scores.jpg
370 ms
Exposed-Aggregate-Sealer.jpeg
369 ms
module-title-bg.png
449 ms
module-title-accent.png
449 ms
idc-c-h.png
185 ms
idc-transparent.png
251 ms
idw-jump.png
169 ms
sidemenu-arrows.png
452 ms
footer-overlay.png
485 ms
ColabReg-webfont.woff
488 ms
wordpressTemplateLinkWrapper2.php
169 ms
all.js
285 ms
widgets.js
89 ms
plusone.js
122 ms
body-rokinputs.png
400 ms
blank.gif
419 ms
spinner.gif
436 ms
5831387
125 ms
avatar-compact.png
73 ms
avatar-compact.png
53 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
4 ms
avatar-compact.png
29 ms
avatar-compact.png
31 ms
getCommentCounts.php
85 ms
remoteVisit.php
83 ms
25 ms
xd_arbiter.php
216 ms
xd_arbiter.php
432 ms
pinit.js
15 ms
concretesealerreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
concretesealerreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
concretesealerreview.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Concretesealerreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Concretesealerreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
concretesealerreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Concrete Sealer Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: