Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

consumerscompare.org

Shopping for the next miracle diet? Think twice before you commit to it.

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

17 ms

Resources Loaded

866 ms

Page Rendered

266 ms

consumerscompare.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to consumerscompare.org homepage info - get ready to check Consumerscompare best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about consumerscompare.org

With so many diet producst hitting the market each day we do our best to provide most recent information on what you should be looking out for.

Visit consumerscompare.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Consumerscompare.org page load time and found that the first response time was 17 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

consumerscompare.org performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

consumerscompare.org

17 ms

consumerscompare.org

50 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

57 ms

1456492623index.css

99 ms

1456492621index.css

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Consumerscompare.org, 42% (21 requests) were made to D1gww3pq6rdqfj.cloudfront.net and 18% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (297 ms) relates to the external source Consumerscompareorg.disqus.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (53%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Consumerscompare.org main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 32.9 kB

  • Original 43.8 kB
  • After minification 43.6 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 969.8 kB
  • After minification 969.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Consumerscompare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 425.0 kB

  • Original 652.7 kB
  • After minification 648.3 kB
  • After compression 227.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 425.0 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 132.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Consumerscompare.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (68%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Consumerscompare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

consumerscompare.org accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

consumerscompare.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

consumerscompare.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Consumerscompare.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Consumerscompare.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Consumerscompare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: