Tools & Wizards About Us
content-monster.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

content-monster.com

新宝GG主管

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

752 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

147 ms

content-monster.com screenshot

About Website

Visit content-monster.com now to see the best up-to-date Content Monster content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about content-monster.com

新宝棋牌 新宝棋牌 QQ:63027893 新宝棋牌主管 新宝棋牌招商 新宝棋牌主管 新宝棋牌招商 新宝棋牌平台 新宝棋牌平台 新宝棋牌官方 新宝棋牌官方 新宝棋牌注册 新宝棋牌开户 新宝棋牌注册 新宝棋牌开户 新宝棋牌总代 新宝棋牌大总管 新宝棋牌外招 新宝棋牌股东 新宝棋牌BooS 新宝棋牌专线 新宝棋牌助理 新宝棋牌客服 新宝棋牌微信客服 新宝棋牌在线客服

Visit content-monster.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Content-monster.com page load time and found that the first response time was 752 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

content-monster.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.095

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

content-monster.com

752 ms

zipta.ru

411 ms

bootstrap.min.css

8 ms

roboto.min.css

157 ms

material.min.css

721 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Content-monster.com, 54% (31 requests) were made to Zipta.ru and 21% (12 requests) were made to Vk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (769 ms) relates to the external source Zipta.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 576.0 kB (58%)

Content Size

988.8 kB

After Optimization

412.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Content-monster.com main page is 988.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 365.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 16.5 kB

  • Original 20.9 kB
  • After minification 14.4 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 266.1 kB
  • After minification 264.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Content Monster images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 249.1 kB

  • Original 336.3 kB
  • After minification 274.0 kB
  • After compression 87.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 249.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 309.1 kB

  • Original 365.5 kB
  • After minification 357.2 kB
  • After compression 56.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Content-monster.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 309.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (40%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Monster. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

content-monster.com

content-monster.com

752 ms

zipta.ru

zipta.ru

411 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

8 ms

roboto.min.css

roboto.min.css

157 ms

material.min.css

material.min.css

721 ms

ripples.min.css

ripples.min.css

164 ms

jquery.notyfy.css

jquery.notyfy.css

163 ms

default.css

default.css

248 ms

my2.css

my2.css

180 ms

openapi.js

openapi.js

360 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

8 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

3 ms

ripples.min.js

ripples.min.js

160 ms

material.min.js

material.min.js

168 ms

jquery.notyfy.js

jquery.notyfy.js

293 ms

jquery.dotdotdot.min.js

jquery.dotdotdot.min.js

194 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

39 ms

logo.png

logo.png

113 ms

P9170130.jpg

P9170130.jpg

114 ms

zatraty.jpg

zatraty.jpg

279 ms

P9180252.jpg

P9180252.jpg

335 ms

image_searchging.jpg

image_searchging.jpg

254 ms

P9170119.jpg

P9170119.jpg

256 ms

link-mass.jpg

link-mass.jpg

318 ms

P9180235.jpg

P9180235.jpg

172 ms

keyword-research-filtering-keywords.jpg

keyword-research-filtering-keywords.jpg

253 ms

trust.jpg

trust.jpg

331 ms

0beb4fad3ea092ad7a1c65950ca5f904.jpg

0beb4fad3ea092ad7a1c65950ca5f904.jpg

334 ms

04aef98bd3cb5c96fed023e592434097.jpg

04aef98bd3cb5c96fed023e592434097.jpg

338 ms

c327d268a90632f21bc67acdff55d18b.jpg

c327d268a90632f21bc67acdff55d18b.jpg

368 ms

1c05919b7f7ab6803031a068b61a3c38.jpg

1c05919b7f7ab6803031a068b61a3c38.jpg

398 ms

ava6.jpg

ava6.jpg

413 ms

DO_Logo.png

DO_Logo.png

423 ms

RobotoDraftRegular.woff

RobotoDraftRegular.woff

392 ms

RobotoDraftMedium.woff

RobotoDraftMedium.woff

479 ms

RobotoDraftBold.woff

RobotoDraftBold.woff

523 ms

Material-Design-Icons.woff

Material-Design-Icons.woff

769 ms

upload.gif

upload.gif

120 ms

hit

hit

253 ms

collect

collect

77 ms

widget_community.php

widget_community.php

272 ms

loader_nav19188_3.js

loader_nav19188_3.js

126 ms

lite.css

lite.css

127 ms

lite.js

lite.js

367 ms

lang3_0.js

lang3_0.js

241 ms

widget_community.css

widget_community.css

247 ms

xdm.js

xdm.js

247 ms

al_community.js

al_community.js

252 ms

Dm6irGtti9w.jpg

Dm6irGtti9w.jpg

391 ms

ne8WOH-yheQ.jpg

ne8WOH-yheQ.jpg

375 ms

Sud8Al5eoSw.jpg

Sud8Al5eoSw.jpg

366 ms

40a0Y3Ww47s.jpg

40a0Y3Ww47s.jpg

397 ms

3_RXkqjn0x0.jpg

3_RXkqjn0x0.jpg

377 ms

8bdIFQOgUiM.jpg

8bdIFQOgUiM.jpg

375 ms

e_c454fb5a.jpg

e_c454fb5a.jpg

359 ms

camera_50.png

camera_50.png

122 ms

w_logo.png

w_logo.png

124 ms

Accessibility Review

content-monster.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

content-monster.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

content-monster.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Content-monster.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Content-monster.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

content-monster.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Content Monster. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: