Tools & Wizards About Us
contentamp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

contentamp.com

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

182 ms

contentamp.com screenshot

About Website

Visit contentamp.com now to see the best up-to-date Contentamp content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about contentamp.com

- Content Marketing Services - Native Content Amplification

Visit contentamp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Contentamp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

contentamp.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.contentamp.com

1439 ms

style.css

82 ms

jquery.js

266 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

157 ms

snm-scripts.js

152 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Contentamp.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Contentamp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 136.7 kB (48%)

Content Size

285.9 kB

After Optimization

149.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Contentamp.com main page is 285.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 154.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 16.0 kB
  • After minification 12.1 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.9 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 82.3 kB
  • After minification 79.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Contentamp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 93.7 kB

  • Original 154.9 kB
  • After minification 154.5 kB
  • After compression 61.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 93.7 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 27.6 kB

  • Original 32.8 kB
  • After minification 20.6 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentamp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (50%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Contentamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.contentamp.com

www.contentamp.com

1439 ms

style.css

style.css

82 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

266 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

157 ms

snm-scripts.js

snm-scripts.js

152 ms

dc.js

dc.js

28 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

82 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

CA_Logo_170x50_DarkBgd.png

CA_Logo_170x50_DarkBgd.png

84 ms

bg-nav-tab-div.png

bg-nav-tab-div.png

101 ms

SearchIcon.png

SearchIcon.png

78 ms

AdYouLike_Tap2.jpg

AdYouLike_Tap2.jpg

245 ms

FeatureBox1TextUnderline.gif

FeatureBox1TextUnderline.gif

141 ms

FeatureBox2TextUnderline.gif

FeatureBox2TextUnderline.gif

140 ms

FeatureBox3TextUnderline.gif

FeatureBox3TextUnderline.gif

150 ms

DottedLine.gif

DottedLine.gif

165 ms

BulletPoint.png

BulletPoint.png

177 ms

Download_GNA.gif

Download_GNA.gif

347 ms

FooterSplitter.png

FooterSplitter.png

214 ms

share-icn-linkedin.png

share-icn-linkedin.png

224 ms

share-icn-facebook.png

share-icn-facebook.png

230 ms

share-icn-twitter.png

share-icn-twitter.png

244 ms

google-Plus-icon.png

google-Plus-icon.png

280 ms

Accessibility Review

contentamp.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

contentamp.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

contentamp.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8"

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentamp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Contentamp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8". Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

contentamp.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Contentamp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: