Tools & Wizards About Us
copycraft.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

copycraft.com

Slate Group - Lubbock & National Commercial Printer

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

152 ms

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

452 ms

copycraft.com screenshot

About Website

Visit copycraft.com now to see the best up-to-date Copycraft content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about copycraft.com

Invitations, wall wraps, brochures, graphics. Our quality, in-house services include custom design, printing, installation, and mailing. Think Big. Print Big.

Visit copycraft.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Copycraft.com page load time and found that the first response time was 152 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

copycraft.com performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value18.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value56.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value31.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,880 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.192

64/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value52.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

copycraft.com

152 ms

slategroup.com

835 ms

analytics.js

14 ms

goal.min.js

14 ms

ga.js

14 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Copycraft.com, 84% (82 requests) were made to Slategroup.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) relates to the external source Slategroup.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (50%)

Content Size

5.8 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Copycraft.com main page is 5.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 94.8 kB

  • Original 121.5 kB
  • After minification 118.6 kB
  • After compression 26.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 181.8 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Copycraft images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 874.4 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 372.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 874.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.8 MB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB
  • After compression 240.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Copycraft.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (49%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

46

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Copycraft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

copycraft.com

copycraft.com

152 ms

slategroup.com

slategroup.com

835 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

14 ms

goal.min.js

goal.min.js

14 ms

ga.js

ga.js

14 ms

styles.css

styles.css

99 ms

front.css

front.css

122 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

186 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

127 ms

go_pricing_styles.css

go_pricing_styles.css

130 ms

mediaelementplayer.min.css

mediaelementplayer.min.css

144 ms

mediaelementplayer.css

mediaelementplayer.css

150 ms

settings.css

settings.css

199 ms

checkbox.min.css

checkbox.min.css

183 ms

default.min.css

default.min.css

181 ms

form.min.css

form.min.css

206 ms

js_composer.css

js_composer.css

287 ms

css

css

40 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

411 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

240 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

249 ms

main-31c4dea782.css

main-31c4dea782.css

261 ms

custom-f069697dd4.css

custom-f069697dd4.css

500 ms

media-31c4dea782.css

media-31c4dea782.css

308 ms

style.css

style.css

307 ms

ultimate.min.css

ultimate.min.css

448 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

345 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

539 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

370 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

436 ms

front.js

front.js

496 ms

chosen.jquery.min.js

chosen.jquery.min.js

560 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

577 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

562 ms

above-the-fold.min.js

above-the-fold.min.js

561 ms

ultimate.min.js

ultimate.min.js

641 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

561 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

573 ms

collect

collect

19 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

go_pricing_scripts.js

go_pricing_scripts.js

595 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

596 ms

wp-mediaelement.js

wp-mediaelement.js

597 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

15 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

773 ms

js_composer_front.js

js_composer_front.js

587 ms

jquery.validationEngine.js

jquery.validationEngine.js

655 ms

jquery.validationEngine-en.js

jquery.validationEngine-en.js

589 ms

dt-contact-form.js

dt-contact-form.js

587 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

31 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

31 ms

1018 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

104 ms

Commercial_Printers_Details_2.jpg

Commercial_Printers_Details_2.jpg

2251 ms

Enterprise_Printers_Relationships_2.jpg

Enterprise_Printers_Relationships_2.jpg

2908 ms

National_Printing_Results-2.jpg

National_Printing_Results-2.jpg

2627 ms

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

32 ms

IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff

IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff

34 ms

Untitled-design-3.png

Untitled-design-3.png

1129 ms

Untitled-design-1.png

Untitled-design-1.png

1288 ms

Untitled-design-2.png

Untitled-design-2.png

1749 ms

Untitled-design.png

Untitled-design.png

1870 ms

Defaults.woff

Defaults.woff

1767 ms

1731816.js

1731816.js

878 ms

807 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

1040 ms

shadow3.png

shadow3.png

1059 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

1086 ms

large_left.png

large_left.png

1160 ms

large_right.png

large_right.png

1176 ms

Sg60.png

Sg60.png

1204 ms

SG_mobile.png

SG_mobile.png

1271 ms

Western-Civilization-Booklet-1-225x150.jpg

Western-Civilization-Booklet-1-225x150.jpg

1293 ms

Tennessee-Musician-3-225x150.jpg

Tennessee-Musician-3-225x150.jpg

1342 ms

pages-225x150.jpg

pages-225x150.jpg

1444 ms

Southwest-Airlines-7-224x150.jpg

Southwest-Airlines-7-224x150.jpg

1444 ms

annualreport-225x150.jpg

annualreport-225x150.jpg

1667 ms

Red-Raider-Club-1-225x150.jpg

Red-Raider-Club-1-225x150.jpg

1506 ms

ranch_party_1-225x150.jpg

ranch_party_1-225x150.jpg

1594 ms

opaque_white2-225x150.jpg

opaque_white2-225x150.jpg

1625 ms

Noche-de-Gala-Invite-3-225x150.jpg

Noche-de-Gala-Invite-3-225x150.jpg

1675 ms

Lazy-CK-Ranch-Collateral-2-225x150.jpg

Lazy-CK-Ranch-Collateral-2-225x150.jpg

1722 ms

Glo-3-225x150.jpg

Glo-3-225x150.jpg

1721 ms

Earls-1-225x150.jpg

Earls-1-225x150.jpg

1756 ms

Escrap-225x150.jpg

Escrap-225x150.jpg

2008 ms

diecut1-225x150.jpg

diecut1-225x150.jpg

1835 ms

cattlefront-225x150.jpg

cattlefront-225x150.jpg

1885 ms

otherbookfront-225x150.jpg

otherbookfront-225x150.jpg

2062 ms

Casolas-2-225x150.jpg

Casolas-2-225x150.jpg

1954 ms

Carpenters-Church-5-225x150.jpg

Carpenters-Church-5-225x150.jpg

2000 ms

featurecarnival-225x150.jpg

featurecarnival-225x150.jpg

2045 ms

Betenbough-5-225x150.jpg

Betenbough-5-225x150.jpg

2050 ms

53 ms

tnmea-casestudy-thumbnail1-450x300.jpg

tnmea-casestudy-thumbnail1-450x300.jpg

2028 ms

hang3-450x300.jpg

hang3-450x300.jpg

1912 ms

digitaldepartment1-450x300.jpg

digitaldepartment1-450x300.jpg

1794 ms

casestudy1-450x300.jpg

casestudy1-450x300.jpg

1384 ms

__ptq.gif

__ptq.gif

5 ms

Accessibility Review

copycraft.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

copycraft.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Copycraft.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Copycraft.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

copycraft.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Copycraft. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: