4.6 sec in total
489 ms
3.6 sec
488 ms
Click here to check amazing Corevision content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about corevision.in
Corevision Home
Visit corevision.inWe analyzed Corevision.in page load time and found that the first response time was 489 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
corevision.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value15.1 s
1/100
10%
Value500 ms
58/100
30%
Value0.148
76/100
15%
Value9.7 s
28/100
10%
489 ms
610 ms
894 ms
38 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Corevision.in, 61% (40 requests) were made to Cdn.corevision.in and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.corevision.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (43%)
3.1 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Corevision.in main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Corevision images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 534.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 534.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 757.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Corevision.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 757.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (9%)
57
52
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Corevision. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
corevision.in
489 ms
www.corevision.in
610 ms
22e7c48bfac3d1ace38ba5d1caaed945412d58b8.css
894 ms
css
38 ms
css
50 ms
css
59 ms
ionicons.min.css
48 ms
font-awesome.min.css
26 ms
70000941.jpg
50 ms
70000013.jpg
54 ms
70000030.jpg
59 ms
70002251.jpg
61 ms
70011801.jpg
61 ms
70012431.jpg
60 ms
70013477.jpg
61 ms
70013502.jpg
62 ms
70013943.jpg
65 ms
70015212.jpg
63 ms
70012958.jpg
72 ms
70013052.jpg
63 ms
70013054.jpg
69 ms
70013847.jpg
67 ms
70013933.jpg
67 ms
70014027.jpg
67 ms
70011801.jpg
69 ms
70002251.jpg
510 ms
70013943.jpg
506 ms
70015212.jpg
742 ms
logo.png
441 ms
card-3.jpg
470 ms
card-4.jpg
966 ms
card-2.jpg
478 ms
562125c235a93e055cbeb2a6f8a56933150bff0c.js
964 ms
70012431.jpg
518 ms
70013477.jpg
504 ms
70013502.jpg
511 ms
70000013.jpg
963 ms
70000942.jpg
1412 ms
70000013.jpg
964 ms
70000030.jpg
963 ms
70002251.jpg
984 ms
70011801.jpg
1203 ms
70012431.jpg
1393 ms
70013477.jpg
1404 ms
70013502.jpg
1402 ms
70013943.jpg
984 ms
70015212.jpg
1412 ms
70012958.jpg
1655 ms
70013052.jpg
1842 ms
70013054.jpg
1370 ms
70013847.jpg
1794 ms
70013933.jpg
1812 ms
70014027.jpg
1804 ms
img-11.jpg
1358 ms
bg-page-header.jpg
1303 ms
bg-map.png
1342 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
74 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
81 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
22 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
479 ms
gtm.js
106 ms
analytics.js
27 ms
collect
15 ms
collect
50 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
480 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
469 ms
corevision.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
corevision.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
corevision.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Corevision.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Corevision.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
corevision.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Corevision. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: