Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

cricketyard.com

cricketyard.com - Registered at Namecheap.com

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

514 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

551 ms

cricketyard.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cricketyard content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cricketyard.com

Videos of the best cricket players in the world sharing their tips and insights. Featuring AB de Villiers.

Visit cricketyard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cricketyard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 514 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cricketyard.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value850 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.8 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.cricketyard.com

514 ms

srcdoc-polyfill.50aaf56fd9a3.js

88 ms

jquery.min.js

60 ms

useragent.fee9f5557a33.js

104 ms

animo.b1d06bb0a90b.js

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cricketyard.com, 63% (22 requests) were made to Siteassets.pagecloud.com and 14% (5 requests) were made to Assets.pagecloud.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (530 ms) relates to the external source Cricketyard.wufoo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 240.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Cricketyard.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 54.0 kB

  • Original 62.2 kB
  • After minification 61.8 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 37.8 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cricketyard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 121.9 kB

  • Original 235.6 kB
  • After minification 235.3 kB
  • After compression 113.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 121.9 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 26.7 kB

  • Original 34.7 kB
  • After minification 34.3 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cricketyard.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (21%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cricketyard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cricketyard.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cricketyard.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

cricketyard.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cricketyard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cricketyard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cricketyard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: