6 sec in total
268 ms
5.2 sec
617 ms
Click here to check amazing Critical content for Poland. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about critical.pl
Szukasz doświadczonej agencji SEO/SEM, która pomoże Ci rozwinąć Twój e-commerce? Sprawdź nas! Zamów audyt obecnie prowadzonych działań i sprawdź, czy możemy dać Ci więcej.
Visit critical.plWe analyzed Critical.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 268 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
critical.pl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
87/100
10%
Value2.1 s
95/100
25%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
Value450 ms
62/100
30%
Value0.03
100/100
15%
Value2.6 s
98/100
10%
268 ms
172 ms
186 ms
193 ms
184 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Critical.pl, 14% (6 requests) were made to Secure.livechatinc.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.livechatinc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Critical.pl.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (72%)
1.5 MB
416.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Critical.pl main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 850.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Critical needs image optimization as it can save up to 35.4 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 594.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 594.4 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 372.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Critical.pl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 372.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (79%)
38
8
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Critical. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
critical.pl
268 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
172 ms
swipebox.min.css
186 ms
style.css
193 ms
screen.min.css
184 ms
thrive_default.css
277 ms
thrive_colors.css
226 ms
thrive_flat.css
347 ms
child-pages-shortcode.min.css
358 ms
reset.css
358 ms
main_blue.css
1813 ms
default.min.css
1722 ms
shortcodes.css
2728 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
2730 ms
jquery.js
2832 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2733 ms
compat.min.js
3734 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
3734 ms
front.js
3736 ms
script.min.js
3732 ms
child-pages-shortcode.min.js
3741 ms
load.sumome.com
351 ms
front.min.js
3794 ms
thrive_content_builder_frontend.min.js
3911 ms
script.min.js
4761 ms
wp-embed.min.js
3910 ms
ga.js
25 ms
__utm.gif
68 ms
tracking.js
78 ms
critical_poziom_kolor.png
990 ms
sprite-web.png
1175 ms
PartnerBadge-Horizontal.jpg
1006 ms
sw-icon-font.woff
947 ms
script_data.js
117 ms
localization.pl.0.e76f79a432d8353744d4f329af36dd3e_6bfbea471a32d890c0449e0bde270288.js
62 ms
ping
99 ms
open_chat.cgi
79 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
68 ms
livechat-modern_7cf45543dc.ttf
28 ms
embedded.20160229163048.js
105 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
31 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
29 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
24 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
32 ms
critical.pl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
critical.pl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
critical.pl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
PL
PL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Critical.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Critical.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
critical.pl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Critical. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: