962 ms in total
86 ms
656 ms
220 ms
Visit dailymile.com now to see the best up-to-date Dailymile content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dailymile.com
Social training and racing for runners, triathletes, and cyclists.
Visit dailymile.comWe analyzed Dailymile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 876 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
dailymile.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
97/100
10%
Value3.2 s
73/100
25%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
86 ms
100 ms
19 ms
19 ms
149 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Dailymile.com, 51% (29 requests) were made to Dnetd3r67cewl.cloudfront.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (249 ms) belongs to the original domain Dailymile.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (67%)
2.5 MB
838.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Dailymile.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Dailymile needs image optimization as it can save up to 69.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 477.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dailymile.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 477.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (18%)
55
45
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dailymile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
dailymile.com
86 ms
www.dailymile.com
100 ms
ga.js
19 ms
api.js
19 ms
screen.css
149 ms
1453752287.jpg
54 ms
core_2.js
249 ms
quant.js
44 ms
connect_white_large_long.gif
94 ms
home_tour_map.png
206 ms
home_tour_motivation.png
128 ms
home_tour_challenge.png
129 ms
android_iphone_home.png
206 ms
1443214863.jpg
49 ms
1453752287.jpg
50 ms
1451697124.jpg
51 ms
1409237267.jpg
52 ms
1456582352.jpg
54 ms
1409270890.jpg
55 ms
1409080332.jpg
52 ms
1409207173.jpg
56 ms
1409198246.jpg
57 ms
1409081440.jpg
56 ms
1415784865.jpg
58 ms
1452483614.jpg
58 ms
1409191255.jpg
58 ms
1436630816.jpg
57 ms
1421808265.jpg
58 ms
1450362295.jpg
58 ms
1409078672.jpg
59 ms
1454949047.jpg
60 ms
1447723910.jpg
59 ms
1409137032.jpg
58 ms
1450362295.jpg
61 ms
1409144674.jpg
60 ms
1445313141.jpg
60 ms
1409207301.jpg
61 ms
1447723910.jpg
61 ms
1431114109.jpg
62 ms
1409090958.jpg
63 ms
1439649776.jpg
62 ms
__utm.gif
10 ms
home_repeat_background.png
99 ms
dailymile_logo_tagline.png
99 ms
connect_sprite.png
99 ms
noise.png
99 ms
home_digits.png
99 ms
home_digits_ticking.png
147 ms
home-fb980c7120.png
137 ms
utility-bce4822149.png
240 ms
diamond_texture.png
137 ms
sdk.js
15 ms
pixel;r=1686869050;a=p-d2cLjSnD5K_ts;fpan=1;fpa=P0-780101066-1456749949355;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456749949354;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymile.com%2F;ogl=
14 ms
entries.json
132 ms
139 ms
xd_arbiter.php
34 ms
xd_arbiter.php
39 ms
dailymile.com accessibility score
dailymile.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
dailymile.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dailymile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dailymile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dailymile.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dailymile. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: