2.3 sec in total
405 ms
1.4 sec
474 ms
Click here to check amazing Daniel Plan content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about danielplan.com
Visit danielplan.comWe analyzed Danielplan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 405 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
danielplan.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value1,690 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.052
99/100
15%
Value14.8 s
8/100
10%
405 ms
30 ms
238 ms
224 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Danielplan.com, 12% (7 requests) were made to S.dev.origin.sharecare.com.s3.amazonaws.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (822 ms) belongs to the original domain Danielplan.com.
Page size can be reduced by 593.4 kB (25%)
2.4 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Danielplan.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 153.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Daniel Plan images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 385.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 385.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Danielplan.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (39%)
57
35
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Daniel Plan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
danielplan.com
405 ms
ga.js
30 ms
GetTheme.aspx
238 ms
WebResource.axd
224 ms
jquery.min.js
49 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
50 ms
AhlEkt6lEeK6yRIxOQulpA.js
17 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
458 ms
__utm.gif
10 ms
css
23 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
165 ms
splash-video.jpg
527 ms
DP-success-2-554x257.jpg
30 ms
dp-splay-2.jpg
524 ms
dp-splay.jpg
390 ms
DanielPlan_OnlineStudyAd.jpg
467 ms
1DE.jpg
312 ms
DP-ad-3-357x357.jpg
320 ms
amber-home.jpg
409 ms
jquery-2.0.3.min.js
393 ms
global.js
406 ms
home.js
443 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
468 ms
parsley.min.js
472 ms
jquery.cookie.js
477 ms
parsley.js
420 ms
knockout-3.0.0.js
83 ms
knockout.mapping-latest.js
520 ms
sbwidget-config-1.0.1.js
537 ms
sbwidget-1.0.1.js
548 ms
sbwidget-emailsubscription-1.0.0.js
548 ms
home.js
50 ms
conversion.js
19 ms
DP-media1-cbs-352x263.jpg
668 ms
DP-media4-theview-352x263.jpg
666 ms
DP-media3-foxfriends-352x263.jpg
735 ms
dr-warren.png
731 ms
dr-oz.png
736 ms
dr-amen.png
735 ms
dr-hyman.png
822 ms
css
14 ms
sprite-icons.png
407 ms
dp-carousel-slide1-1024x600.jpg
52 ms
hiw-faith.png
309 ms
hiw-food.png
309 ms
hiw-fitness.png
309 ms
hiw-focus.png
308 ms
hiw-friends.png
308 ms
dp-carousel-slide-instructors-1024x600.jpg
672 ms
dp-carousel-slide3-1024x600.jpg
529 ms
dp-carousel-slide3-1024x600.jpg
19 ms
essentials-bg.jpg
40 ms
mavenprolight-300-webfont.woff
435 ms
118 ms
arrow-prev.png
41 ms
arrow-next.png
13 ms
bx_loader.gif
162 ms
fancybox_overlay.png
162 ms
32 ms
fancybox_sprite.png
85 ms
danielplan.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
danielplan.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
danielplan.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Danielplan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Danielplan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
danielplan.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Daniel Plan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: