5 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.6 sec
324 ms
Visit dentistry-review.com now to see the best up-to-date Dentistry Review content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dentistry-review.com
Did cavemen suffer from tooth decay? Does oil pulling actually work? We answer the important questions with short, fun reads for you.
Visit dentistry-review.comWe analyzed Dentistry-review.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
dentistry-review.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
72/100
10%
Value2.5 s
89/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.076
95/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
1061 ms
72 ms
7 ms
389 ms
151 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Dentistry-review.com, 29% (27 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 14% (13 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Dentistry-review.com.
Page size can be reduced by 87.3 kB (21%)
424.6 kB
337.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Dentistry-review.com main page is 424.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 316.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dentistry Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.0 kB or 43% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dentistry-review.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (55%)
88
40
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dentistry Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dentistry-review.com
1061 ms
style.css
72 ms
show_ads.js
7 ms
blue.css
389 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
151 ms
ca-pub-5624054726301293.js
571 ms
zrt_lookup.html
36 ms
show_ads_impl.js
55 ms
blue-bg.png
143 ms
house.png
141 ms
btn-search.png
142 ms
Staff-Photo-1024x636.jpg
163 ms
ads
375 ms
header-bg.png
38 ms
header-lower-swirl.png
102 ms
header-upper-swirl.png
38 ms
grey.png
38 ms
post-top-bg.png
75 ms
post-body-bg.png
74 ms
osd.js
14 ms
en_US
22 ms
widget.js
68 ms
feed.png
69 ms
facebook.png
96 ms
twitter.png
103 ms
youtube.png
103 ms
ads
216 ms
163 ms
233 ms
xd_arbiter.php
140 ms
xd_arbiter.php
313 ms
post-bottom-bg.png
87 ms
ping
139 ms
css
70 ms
m_js_controller.js
36 ms
abg.js
38 ms
129 ms
footer-bg-top.png
39 ms
footer-bg.png
40 ms
favicon
65 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
50 ms
s
43 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
66 ms
favicon
44 ms
x_button_blue2.png
17 ms
fan.php
446 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
12 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
65 ms
ui
24 ms
ebiMDO3r-8l.css
173 ms
wakJkBioHgT.css
215 ms
6qHpHChjY_J.css
256 ms
k5BhlqovqZn.css
284 ms
ztINr5qMqM_.css
331 ms
uVjHKJ0glvg.css
320 ms
TKuNj0xVh4A.js
341 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
371 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
294 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
340 ms
njO1TPvGzoR.js
358 ms
OloiM1PZafe.js
359 ms
LTv6ZK-5zxz.js
472 ms
1FCa-btixu2.js
395 ms
Oagsvfb4VWi.js
410 ms
pObvZSrFc_4.js
414 ms
Nn19HjwCsOL.js
398 ms
H3EKDTObx05.js
409 ms
OZFAYTv-ZUg.js
432 ms
1QuX41zDRrx.js
437 ms
11698468_10153068661185840_5906767869572469149_n.jpg
377 ms
safe_image.php
920 ms
safe_image.php
993 ms
20483_10152706371385840_1823099891122840480_n.png
403 ms
11251772_1004904579540710_3538171209016189171_n.jpg
444 ms
12301550_10205783130190733_1105854313207687840_n.jpg
470 ms
11068185_10153408217273929_1487647874468767060_n.jpg
472 ms
1560588_724751064293390_922678923206543825_n.jpg
473 ms
995314_10207089580271228_3102536899802127632_n.jpg
477 ms
971438_1725436734367250_208813852647077788_n.jpg
539 ms
10368438_713137098743083_5548626094152111835_n.jpg
482 ms
1962735_360970290709971_183066388_n.jpg
569 ms
12800122_10153495722950840_3760845807476852740_n.jpg
575 ms
12809783_10153484381870840_3437807278020627990_n.png
852 ms
12801520_10153482405195840_108977626399943539_n.jpg
708 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
155 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
157 ms
QDwYpIaRyfG.png
156 ms
K00K-UgnsKu.png
153 ms
gxbPuQdXIZP.png
60 ms
activeview
14 ms
activeview
15 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
42 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
45 ms
dentistry-review.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
dentistry-review.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
dentistry-review.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dentistry-review.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dentistry-review.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dentistry-review.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dentistry Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: