3.7 sec in total
779 ms
2.5 sec
384 ms
Welcome to didi.io homepage info - get ready to check Didi best content for Malta right away, or after learning these important things about didi.io
DiDi Affiliates was build to cover the need for a simple and easy to use affiliate software. DiDi Affiliate Software is owned by i-Tainment Europe Ltd, a company incorporated in Malta
Visit didi.ioWe analyzed Didi.io page load time and found that the first response time was 779 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
didi.io performance score
779 ms
148 ms
42 ms
250 ms
175 ms
Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Didi.io, 30% (33 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 8% (9 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Didi.io.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (25%)
4.1 MB
3.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Didi.io main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Didi images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 683.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 683.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 280.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Didi.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 280.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (52%)
100
48
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Didi. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
didi.io
779 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
148 ms
css
42 ms
genericons.css
250 ms
style.css
175 ms
bootstrap.min.css
444 ms
font-awesome.min.css
266 ms
animate.css
374 ms
font.css
230 ms
prettyPhoto.css
344 ms
typography.css
314 ms
theme.css
497 ms
black.css
479 ms
responsive.css
431 ms
style_2.1.2.css
454 ms
jquery.js
652 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
518 ms
functions.js
471 ms
bootstrap.min.js
562 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js
834 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
519 ms
js
27 ms
gmaps.js
713 ms
jquery.parallax.js
558 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
655 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
656 ms
jquery.appear.js
655 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
683 ms
wow.min.js
684 ms
jquery.countTo.js
735 ms
smooth-scroll.js
735 ms
main.js
775 ms
comment-reply.min.js
766 ms
front_page_script.js
796 ms
script_2.1.2.js
822 ms
black-loading.gif
205 ms
logo.png
233 ms
the-online-betting2.jpg
808 ms
slide-1.jpg
525 ms
service-1.png
559 ms
service-2.png
650 ms
service-3.png
414 ms
btm1s.jpg
352 ms
btm1.jpg
729 ms
arrows.png
489 ms
btm2s.jpg
544 ms
btm2.jpg
779 ms
btm3s.jpg
631 ms
btm3.jpg
824 ms
btm4s.jpg
712 ms
btm4.jpg
919 ms
btm5s.jpg
796 ms
btm5.jpg
983 ms
aller_lt-webfont.svg
837 ms
aller_lt-webfont.woff
852 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
869 ms
aller_rg-webfont.svg
882 ms
aller_rg-webfont.woff
923 ms
allerdisplay-webfont.svg
1015 ms
allerdisplay-webfont.woff
962 ms
common.js
24 ms
map.js
25 ms
util.js
23 ms
marker.js
24 ms
onion.js
24 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
34 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
60 ms
stats.js
16 ms
controls.js
11 ms
transparent.png
20 ms
css
48 ms
google4.png
35 ms
mapcnt6.png
41 ms
sv5.png
42 ms
spotlight-poi.png
42 ms
tmapctrl.png
22 ms
tmapctrl4.png
21 ms
google_white5.png
27 ms
vt
48 ms
vt
91 ms
vt
39 ms
vt
46 ms
vt
34 ms
vt
33 ms
vt
60 ms
vt
85 ms
vt
54 ms
vt
98 ms
vt
91 ms
vt
74 ms
vt
97 ms
vt
131 ms
vt
102 ms
vt
135 ms
vt
138 ms
vt
107 ms
vt
111 ms
vt
144 ms
vt
127 ms
vt
158 ms
vt
173 ms
vt
148 ms
vt
152 ms
CrYjSnGjrRCn0pd9VQsnFOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
5 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
15 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
16 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOLO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
14 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
230 ms
nr-892.min.js
41 ms
didi.io SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Didi.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Didi.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
didi.io
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Didi. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: