3.1 sec in total
277 ms
2.6 sec
210 ms
Visit easybrandcheck.com now to see the best up-to-date Easybrandcheck content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about easybrandcheck.com
Professional linguistic screening for brand names, logos and taglines to help you develop new brands, new products and new territories.
Visit easybrandcheck.comWe analyzed Easybrandcheck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 277 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
easybrandcheck.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value9.8 s
0/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value1,450 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.088
92/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
277 ms
589 ms
95 ms
187 ms
546 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Easybrandcheck.com, 13% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (908 ms) belongs to the original domain Easybrandcheck.com.
Page size can be reduced by 389.4 kB (33%)
1.2 MB
802.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Easybrandcheck.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 675.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 809 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Easybrandcheck images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 346.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 346.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Easybrandcheck.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (74%)
27
7
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Easybrandcheck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
easybrandcheck.com
277 ms
easybrandcheck.com
589 ms
cfmessage.js
95 ms
cfajax.js
187 ms
prototype.js
546 ms
scriptaculous.js
275 ms
ajax.js
286 ms
brandy.js
288 ms
tcal.js
379 ms
urchin.js
9 ms
analytics.js
11 ms
admin.css
393 ms
ebc_home.css
175 ms
ebc_styles.css
187 ms
general_styles.css
190 ms
tcal.css
266 ms
tabs.css
278 ms
effects.js
94 ms
dragdrop.js
101 ms
slider.js
99 ms
engine.js
94 ms
util.js
98 ms
wddx.js
96 ms
ebc_logo.png
93 ms
EBC_logo_powered.png
92 ms
skyline1.jpg
908 ms
checkmark.png
92 ms
Trebuchet_MS.ttf
546 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
collect
31 ms
easybrandcheck.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
easybrandcheck.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
easybrandcheck.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Easybrandcheck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Easybrandcheck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
easybrandcheck.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Easybrandcheck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: