15.1 sec in total
3.2 sec
11.4 sec
480 ms
Click here to check amazing Efl content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about efl.co.in
A suite of financial solutions for your business. Explore our MSME loans and SME loans that help us create success stories for our customers.
Visit efl.co.inWe analyzed Efl.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 3.2 sec and then it took 11.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
efl.co.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.9 s
0/100
10%
Value12.7 s
0/100
25%
Value15.0 s
1/100
10%
Value540 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.054
98/100
15%
Value15.0 s
8/100
10%
3217 ms
25 ms
37 ms
1453 ms
1267 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Efl.co.in, 6% (5 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Efl.co.in.
Page size can be reduced by 433.9 kB (26%)
1.7 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Efl.co.in main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.7 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Efl images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 149.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 149.2 kB or 44% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 216.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efl.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 216.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (46%)
78
42
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Efl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
efl.co.in
3217 ms
css
25 ms
css
37 ms
styles.css
1453 ms
responsive.css
1267 ms
animated.css
762 ms
bootstrap.css
1919 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1754 ms
navigation-icons.css
1029 ms
owl.carousel.css
1296 ms
owl.theme.css
1496 ms
jquery.dialogbox.css
1528 ms
jquery-1.2.6.min.js
42 ms
conversion.js
15 ms
element.js
54 ms
jquery.min.js
66 ms
bootstrap.min.js
36 ms
modernizr.custom.js
683 ms
carousel.js
839 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
932 ms
custom.js
928 ms
jquerypp.custom.js
950 ms
jquery.bookblock.js
1211 ms
slider.js
1221 ms
animations.min.js
1220 ms
jquery.dialogBox.js
1266 ms
analytics.js
30 ms
home-banner1.jpg
1014 ms
home-banner2.jpg
327 ms
home-banner3.jpg
1483 ms
home-banner5.jpg
671 ms
mobile-banner1.jpg
1346 ms
mobile-banner2.jpg
810 ms
mobile-banner3.jpg
605 ms
mobile-banner4.jpg
896 ms
mobile-banner5.jpg
934 ms
img1.png
1115 ms
img2.png
1182 ms
img3.png
1203 ms
img4.png
1276 ms
img5.png
1422 ms
img6.png
1462 ms
1.jpg
1468 ms
2.jpg
1541 ms
3.jpg
2266 ms
4.jpg
1730 ms
eligibility-calculator.jpg
2318 ms
1.jpg
1762 ms
2.jpg
1755 ms
Eligibility-calculator.gif
1791 ms
translateelement.css
208 ms
main.js
282 ms
logo.png
1908 ms
img1.png
1856 ms
img2.png
1872 ms
img3.png
1919 ms
img4.png
2095 ms
img5.png
2132 ms
img6.png
2202 ms
home-banner.jpg
2186 ms
machine-tool.png
2591 ms
fontawesome-webfontf77b.woff
2422 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
26 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
53 ms
IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff
81 ms
printing.png
2392 ms
plastic.png
2460 ms
120 ms
collect
153 ms
packaging.png
2401 ms
element_main.js
67 ms
wood-working.png
2307 ms
textiles.png
2196 ms
pharmaceutical.png
2493 ms
generators.png
2063 ms
solar.png
2007 ms
shadow-devider.png
2038 ms
translate_24dp.png
51 ms
l
45 ms
cleardot.gif
21 ms
banner-Scratch-LP-08.png
6275 ms
te_ctrl3.gif
12 ms
fontawesome-webfontf77b.ttf
961 ms
js
75 ms
efl.co.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
efl.co.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
efl.co.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efl.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efl.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
efl.co.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Efl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: