Tools & Wizards About Us
eldermark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

eldermark.com

Senior Living Software Solutions | Eldermark

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

213 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

163 ms

eldermark.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to eldermark.com homepage info - get ready to check Eldermark best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about eldermark.com

If you're looking for senior living solutions that will help you streamline your operations, and help you focus on your residents, look no further than Eldermark.

Visit eldermark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Eldermark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eldermark.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,700 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.083

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.5 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eldermark.com

213 ms

www.eldermark.com

967 ms

bootstrap.min.css

612 ms

base.css

140 ms

layout.css

353 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Eldermark.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Eldermark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 687.9 kB (44%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

873.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eldermark.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 773.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 31.6 kB

  • Original 40.3 kB
  • After minification 33.4 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.9 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 77.5 kB

  • Original 773.1 kB
  • After minification 695.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eldermark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 412.5 kB

  • Original 548.6 kB
  • After minification 409.8 kB
  • After compression 136.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 412.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 166.3 kB

  • Original 199.6 kB
  • After minification 184.3 kB
  • After compression 33.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eldermark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 166.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (28%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

38

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eldermark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eldermark.com

eldermark.com

213 ms

www.eldermark.com

www.eldermark.com

967 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

612 ms

base.css

base.css

140 ms

layout.css

layout.css

353 ms

new-styles.css

new-styles.css

137 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.css

bootstrap-datetimepicker.css

285 ms

royalslider.css

royalslider.css

269 ms

rs-default.css

rs-default.css

277 ms

css

css

27 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

jquery-latest.min.js

6 ms

jquery.royalslider.min.js

jquery.royalslider.min.js

477 ms

raphael.js

raphael.js

884 ms

jquery.usmap.js

jquery.usmap.js

685 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

496 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.js

bootstrap-datetimepicker.js

699 ms

respond.js

respond.js

613 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

701 ms

banner.png

banner.png

315 ms

shadow.png

shadow.png

149 ms

shadow-light.png

shadow-light.png

147 ms

logo.png

logo.png

150 ms

bg-lg.png

bg-lg.png

356 ms

1.png

1.png

492 ms

2.png

2.png

360 ms

3.png

3.png

880 ms

4.png

4.png

687 ms

5.png

5.png

419 ms

market-minder-video-thumb.jpg

market-minder-video-thumb.jpg

498 ms

emar-direct-connect-video-thumb.jpg

emar-direct-connect-video-thumb.jpg

497 ms

service-minder-video-thumb.jpg

service-minder-video-thumb.jpg

556 ms

point-of-care-video-thumb2.jpg

point-of-care-video-thumb2.jpg

627 ms

point-of-care-video-thumb.jpg

point-of-care-video-thumb.jpg

763 ms

service-minder-video-thumb2.jpg

service-minder-video-thumb2.jpg

632 ms

header.png

header.png

966 ms

success-home-bulb.png

success-home-bulb.png

765 ms

testimonial-prestige.png

testimonial-prestige.png

768 ms

testimonial-epiphany.png

testimonial-epiphany.png

824 ms

testimonial-terri.png

testimonial-terri.png

902 ms

testimonial-bridge.png

testimonial-bridge.png

901 ms

testimonial-orchard.png

testimonial-orchard.png

904 ms

testimonial-angela.png

testimonial-angela.png

959 ms

testimonial-susan.png

testimonial-susan.png

1014 ms

testimonial-matilda.png

testimonial-matilda.png

1037 ms

testimonial-foxridge.png

testimonial-foxridge.png

1042 ms

testimonial-pat.png

testimonial-pat.png

1041 ms

example.png

example.png

1097 ms

icon-facebook.png

icon-facebook.png

1101 ms

icon-twitter.png

icon-twitter.png

1150 ms

icon-linkedin.png

icon-linkedin.png

1173 ms

icon-googleplus.png

icon-googleplus.png

1175 ms

tree.gif

tree.gif

1312 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

44 ms

rs-default.png

rs-default.png

1160 ms

yVHpdQrmTj9Kax1tmFSx2qCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

yVHpdQrmTj9Kax1tmFSx2qCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

10 ms

f8OBjBbevvywgbyJOxlO7Q.ttf

f8OBjBbevvywgbyJOxlO7Q.ttf

20 ms

RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

20 ms

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf

20 ms

collect

collect

23 ms

Accessibility Review

eldermark.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

eldermark.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

eldermark.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eldermark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eldermark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eldermark.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eldermark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: