Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

equivibe.com

Equivibe | A Proven Track Record

Page Load Speed

19.3 sec in total

First Response

8.5 sec

Resources Loaded

10 sec

Page Rendered

845 ms

equivibe.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to equivibe.com homepage info - get ready to check Equivibe best content right away, or after learning these important things about equivibe.com

Visit equivibe.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Equivibe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 8.5 sec and then it took 10.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

equivibe.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value24.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,260 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.087

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.5 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

equivibe.com

8474 ms

foundation.css

63 ms

style.css

58 ms

css

105 ms

css

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Equivibe.com, 16% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Equivibe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 978.3 kB (71%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

407.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Equivibe.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 952.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 50.3 kB

  • Original 63.4 kB
  • After minification 61.0 kB
  • After compression 13.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 34.3 kB
  • After minification 27.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Equivibe needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 636.5 kB

  • Original 952.0 kB
  • After minification 946.7 kB
  • After compression 315.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 636.5 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 284.7 kB

  • Original 336.3 kB
  • After minification 270.8 kB
  • After compression 51.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Equivibe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 284.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (89%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Equivibe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

equivibe.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

equivibe.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

equivibe.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Equivibe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Equivibe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Equivibe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: