19.3 sec in total
8.5 sec
10 sec
845 ms
Welcome to equivibe.com homepage info - get ready to check Equivibe best content right away, or after learning these important things about equivibe.com
Visit equivibe.comWe analyzed Equivibe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 8.5 sec and then it took 10.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
equivibe.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value24.9 s
0/100
25%
Value14.8 s
1/100
10%
Value1,260 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.087
93/100
15%
Value18.5 s
3/100
10%
8474 ms
63 ms
58 ms
105 ms
118 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Equivibe.com, 16% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Equivibe.com.
Page size can be reduced by 978.3 kB (71%)
1.4 MB
407.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Equivibe.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 952.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Equivibe needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 636.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 636.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 284.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Equivibe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 284.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (89%)
66
7
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Equivibe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
equivibe.com
8474 ms
foundation.css
63 ms
style.css
58 ms
css
105 ms
css
118 ms
foundation-icons.css
146 ms
layerslider.css
142 ms
css
66 ms
styles.css
89 ms
jss-style.css
89 ms
settings.css
251 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
134 ms
woocommerce.css
313 ms
app.css
137 ms
default.min.css
173 ms
jetpack.css
445 ms
jquery.js
733 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
235 ms
greensock.js
524 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
522 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
417 ms
touch.js
368 ms
external-tracking.min.js
399 ms
css
70 ms
css
80 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
944 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
768 ms
jquery.min.js
889 ms
what-input.min.js
537 ms
foundation.min.js
1055 ms
app.js
556 ms
site.js
589 ms
font-awesome.css
821 ms
photon.js
816 ms
jquery.form.min.js
872 ms
scripts.js
871 ms
jss-script.js
872 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
957 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
885 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
884 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
44 ms
e-201613.js
66 ms
lmfx.min.js
69 ms
ctfx.min.js
77 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1040 ms
woocommerce.min.js
950 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
896 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
1085 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1062 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1018 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
logo.png
316 ms
arrow.png
334 ms
facebook.png
334 ms
twitter.png
333 ms
instagram.png
335 ms
pinterest.png
334 ms
search.png
334 ms
cart.png
337 ms
made-in-usa.png
337 ms
dummy.png
338 ms
collect
20 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
278 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
278 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
24 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
260 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
277 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
274 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
275 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
83 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
277 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
277 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
276 ms
arrow.png
70 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
30 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
15 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
14 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
209 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
44 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
20 ms
g.gif
14 ms
equivibe.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
equivibe.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
equivibe.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Equivibe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Equivibe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
equivibe.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Equivibe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: