1.5 sec in total
311 ms
836 ms
311 ms
Welcome to estigator.com homepage info - get ready to check Estigator best content right away, or after learning these important things about estigator.com
Calculate estimated price of any Website. EstiGator.com can calculate a set of complex statistics and appraise your website!
Visit estigator.comWe analyzed Estigator.com page load time and found that the first response time was 311 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Estigator.com rating and web reputation
estigator.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value2.5 s
89/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
311 ms
19 ms
16 ms
28 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Estigator.com, 13% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to Free.pagepeeker.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (320 ms) relates to the external source Free2.pagepeeker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 144.7 kB (60%)
240.8 kB
96.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Estigator.com main page is 240.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 148.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 123 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 120.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Estigator.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 120.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (48%)
23
12
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Estigator. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
estigator.com
311 ms
yeti.bootstrap.min.css
19 ms
app.css
16 ms
font-awesome.min.css
28 ms
socialLink.css
27 ms
font-awesome.css
4 ms
jquery.min.js
7 ms
bootstrap.min.js
26 ms
base.js
22 ms
adsbygoogle.js
13 ms
css
25 ms
alli.png
98 ms
thumbs.php
220 ms
thumbs.php
193 ms
thumbs.php
191 ms
thumbs.php
320 ms
loader.gif
28 ms
ca-pub-8955444499652565.js
320 ms
zrt_lookup.html
57 ms
show_ads_impl.js
62 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
29 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
37 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
47 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
16 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
29 ms
ads
120 ms
osd.js
18 ms
ads
213 ms
thumbs.php
97 ms
thumbs.php
98 ms
estigator.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
estigator.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
estigator.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Estigator.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Estigator.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
estigator.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Estigator. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: