4.2 sec in total
803 ms
2.4 sec
1 sec
Click here to check amazing Ffoof content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ffoof.com
Visit ffoof.comWe analyzed Ffoof.com page load time and found that the first response time was 803 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ffoof.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
83/100
10%
Value3.4 s
66/100
25%
Value2.0 s
99/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.067
97/100
15%
Value3.4 s
93/100
10%
803 ms
62 ms
65 ms
280 ms
67 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Ffoof.com, 12% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (803 ms) belongs to the original domain Ffoof.com.
Page size can be reduced by 237.0 kB (33%)
708.1 kB
471.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Ffoof.com main page is 708.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 380.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ffoof images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 89.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 128.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ffoof.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 128.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (46%)
28
15
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ffoof. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ffoof.com
803 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
62 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
65 ms
woocommerce.css
280 ms
css
67 ms
genericons.css
299 ms
style.css
80 ms
jquery.js
132 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
87 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
34 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
34 ms
woocommerce.min.js
48 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
67 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
68 ms
functions.js
67 ms
Img03858.jpg
94 ms
Img13686.jpg
93 ms
Img06590.jpg
105 ms
Img11046.jpg
94 ms
Img093751.jpg
95 ms
Img13818.jpg
96 ms
Img13538.jpg
96 ms
Img12468.jpg
137 ms
Img07386.jpg
152 ms
Img10080.jpg
140 ms
Img11545.jpg
151 ms
Img10676.jpg
150 ms
www.ffoof.com
612 ms
1bHRUMxmJHoup12DnI9XmQ.woff
25 ms
kU6VHbqMAZhaN_nXCmLQsQ.woff
43 ms
I1Pn3gihk5vyP0Yw5GqKsQ.woff
51 ms
7DI7Kjvwfuz8m3ExKe6m-Q.woff
51 ms
VqvVqv1mv0Gr1Gr9Frul7xuyp+V8XvqnTyb1UoNRm4Af+FsAGNAEuwCFBYsQEBjlmxRgYrWCGwEFlLsBRSWCGwgFkdsAYrXFhZsBQrAAAAAVLP0T8AAA==
3 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
26 ms
ffoof.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ffoof.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ffoof.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ZH
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ffoof.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ffoof.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ffoof.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ffoof. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: