9.7 sec in total
1.1 sec
8.2 sec
379 ms
Welcome to filmmakingreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Filmmakingreview best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about filmmakingreview.com
Film review site offering a film review publicity service. FMR is run by a community of Hollywood filmmakers and those working in the movie industry across the
Visit filmmakingreview.comWe analyzed Filmmakingreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
filmmakingreview.com performance score
1117 ms
100 ms
167 ms
168 ms
170 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Filmmakingreview.com, 12% (6 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Filmmakingreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 275.3 kB (9%)
3.1 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Filmmakingreview.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Filmmakingreview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 177.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 177.5 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filmmakingreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (61%)
49
19
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filmmakingreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.filmmakingreview.com
1117 ms
style.css
100 ms
Lora.css
167 ms
social_comments.css
168 ms
testimonials.css
170 ms
flexslider.css
180 ms
wp_shopping_cart_style.css
181 ms
wpProQuiz_front.min.css
182 ms
fancybox.css
250 ms
widget.css
222 ms
shortcode.css
246 ms
jquery.js
433 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
252 ms
triton.js
255 ms
other.js
279 ms
featureList.js
864 ms
easyslider.js
288 ms
fancybox.js
360 ms
external-tracking.min.js
363 ms
review-schema.css
389 ms
simple-pull-quote.css
1180 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
462 ms
jquery.flexslider.manualDirectionControls.js
454 ms
wp-embed.min.js
462 ms
ga.js
121 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
380 ms
__utm.gif
36 ms
analytics.js
253 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-02-at-1.10.59-PM.png
595 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-02-at-1.14.48-PM.png
4112 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-02-at-1.12.08-PM.png
2584 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-02-at-12.57.04-PM.png
2268 ms
MidSpecialCover-300x126.png
300 ms
ChrisRockOScars-300x169.jpg
250 ms
DreamOscarBallot-300x200.jpg
374 ms
Witch2-300x169.jpg
414 ms
2015-300x169.jpg
621 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-27-at-6.36.54-PM-300x166.png
714 ms
GoldenGlobes2016Poster-300x169.jpg
689 ms
45-Years-xlarge-300x171.jpg
709 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-02-at-2.35.22-PM-300x198.png
834 ms
JoyCover-300x161.jpg
775 ms
no_pattern.png
773 ms
social2.png
921 ms
trans.png
958 ms
lay1_bg.png
1016 ms
trans_white.png
979 ms
lora-regular-webfont.woff
862 ms
collect
45 ms
collect
1582 ms
collect
92 ms
collect
112 ms
filmmakingreview.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filmmakingreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filmmakingreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
filmmakingreview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Filmmakingreview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: