4.3 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.1 sec
135 ms
Click here to check amazing Flash Byte content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about flashbyte.us
Visit flashbyte.usWe analyzed Flashbyte.us page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
flashbyte.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.3 s
0/100
10%
Value14.5 s
0/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value320 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value15.8 s
6/100
10%
1059 ms
1163 ms
256 ms
259 ms
263 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Flashbyte.us, 14% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Flashbyte.us.
Page size can be reduced by 463.1 kB (23%)
2.0 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Flashbyte.us main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Flash Byte images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 279.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 279.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 150.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flashbyte.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 150.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (46%)
24
13
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flash Byte. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
flashbyte.us
1059 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1163 ms
font-awesome.min.css
256 ms
overrides.css
259 ms
styles.css
263 ms
jquery.min.js
433 ms
custom.css
250 ms
unslider.min.js
419 ms
twitter.js
348 ms
bootstrap.min.js
429 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
796 ms
whmcs.js
511 ms
css
28 ms
ga.js
31 ms
flashbyte-logo.png
246 ms
wireless-sign.png
576 ms
flashbyte-products-8-21-12.png
251 ms
NOC.png
676 ms
insane-fast.png
518 ms
rocklaptopwoman.png
625 ms
tech-support.png
905 ms
gaming-woman.png
507 ms
loading.gif
674 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
34 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
902 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
35 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
34 ms
__utm.gif
41 ms
flashbyte.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
flashbyte.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
flashbyte.us SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flashbyte.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Flashbyte.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
flashbyte.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flash Byte. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: