6.1 sec in total
1.7 sec
4 sec
387 ms
Visit flashificator.com now to see the best up-to-date Flashificator content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about flashificator.com
This domain may be for sale!
Visit flashificator.comWe analyzed Flashificator.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
flashificator.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value2.5 s
89/100
25%
Value2.5 s
97/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
1676 ms
485 ms
27 ms
657 ms
551 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Flashificator.com, 11% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to V2.zopim.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Flashificator.com.
Page size can be reduced by 538.8 kB (24%)
2.2 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Flashificator.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Flashificator images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 208.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 208.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 291.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flashificator.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 291.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (40%)
30
18
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flashificator. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
flashificator.com
1676 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
485 ms
css
27 ms
style.css
657 ms
shortcodes.css
551 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
492 ms
jquery.js
558 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
483 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
554 ms
waypoints.min.js
544 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
619 ms
custom.js
826 ms
wp-embed.min.js
613 ms
ga.js
131 ms
ffcLogo3-300x65.png
314 ms
BackgroundFFC.jpg
609 ms
blocks-minified-b.png
1558 ms
1panoc.png
308 ms
2omg.png
309 ms
3html5.png
305 ms
4fpp.png
309 ms
FFClimaScreen-1.jpg
674 ms
1iOSVR.jpg
311 ms
4PTGi.jpg
312 ms
2PM.jpg
312 ms
3NN.jpg
314 ms
33stone-bg.jpg
1252 ms
widget_v2.134.js
61 ms
__utm.gif
250 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
224 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
229 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
245 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
245 ms
ETmodules_v2.ttf
278 ms
avatar_simple_visitor.png
186 ms
flashificator.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
flashificator.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
flashificator.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flashificator.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Flashificator.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
flashificator.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flashificator. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: