7.6 sec in total
820 ms
6.4 sec
372 ms
Visit foodsciencesblog.com now to see the best up-to-date Foodsciencesblog content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about foodsciencesblog.com
Experience the world of Food with interesting facts, tips, fun experiments & lot more ! ! !
Visit foodsciencesblog.comWe analyzed Foodsciencesblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 820 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
foodsciencesblog.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value13.3 s
0/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value380 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.137
80/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
820 ms
140 ms
100 ms
176 ms
178 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Foodsciencesblog.com, 19% (16 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (858 ms) belongs to the original domain Foodsciencesblog.com.
Page size can be reduced by 624.6 kB (21%)
3.0 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Foodsciencesblog.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 91.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foodsciencesblog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 242.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 242.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 234.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foodsciencesblog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 234.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (55%)
84
38
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foodsciencesblog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.foodsciencesblog.com
820 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
140 ms
tfg_style.css
100 ms
CWPPoll.css
176 ms
JqueryUi.css
178 ms
compiled-css-1427987944.css
122 ms
jquery.js
249 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
184 ms
core.min.js
194 ms
CWPPoll.js
197 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.min.js
293 ms
navbar.js
207 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
244 ms
widgets.js
134 ms
all.js
25 ms
plusone.js
88 ms
in.js
54 ms
style.css
382 ms
jquery-ui.css
39 ms
widget.min.js
235 ms
mouse.min.js
285 ms
resizable.min.js
378 ms
draggable.min.js
387 ms
button.min.js
284 ms
position.min.js
390 ms
dialog.min.js
392 ms
connect.js
384 ms
1595567148.js
94 ms
widgets.js
92 ms
plusone.js
45 ms
in.js
29 ms
script.bootstrap.min.js
402 ms
script.blocks.js
387 ms
wp-embed.min.js
392 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
46 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
48 ms
166 ms
search-btn@2x.png
104 ms
probioticcookies.jpg
462 ms
Properties-of-food.jpg
343 ms
fatreplacers.jpg
429 ms
FoodColors2.jpg
456 ms
Beetrootcolors1.jpg
454 ms
Soy.jpg
399 ms
phytochemicals.jpg
518 ms
Flavored-milk.jpg
518 ms
BerriesandCherries.jpg
858 ms
Tastes.jpg
834 ms
body.png
325 ms
gplus-64.png
24 ms
pagelines.png
708 ms
button.png
297 ms
displays.htm
318 ms
widgets.js
56 ms
plus.png
844 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
62 ms
xd_arbiter.php
43 ms
xd_arbiter.php
71 ms
syndication
109 ms
579906532084609025
195 ms
1f61c.png
31 ms
proxy.jpg
197 ms
hkzSrDB5nSy8HV9I.jpg
210 ms
HLSWOjwFJzG7ZyNh.jpg
287 ms
1f36b.png
11 ms
1f374.png
12 ms
proxy.jpg
201 ms
proxy.jpg
332 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.dark.ltr.css
40 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.dark.ltr.css
57 ms
9428c4af37f3129a50679bc1fb7a4207_normal.jpeg
208 ms
Mv4fgDci_normal.jpg
197 ms
55654d0f7c0a7768ec12071fef3e9556_normal.jpeg
193 ms
37b7dd7ab6a90daebafc2bdb378502c2_normal.png
195 ms
WHOLogo_normal.png
195 ms
3LlB4JRb_normal.jpg
216 ms
84GDZd7v_normal.jpeg
221 ms
a5f01a00d46aa04687ea07c3638359c2_normal.jpeg
217 ms
Cc5-XDlUMAAswe-.jpg:small
233 ms
CchmBcfWoAATJih.jpg:small
267 ms
CcNEOdaVIAQdi5y.jpg:small
260 ms
Cbbj_R4W8AEDMRo.jpg:small
238 ms
CRVpmodUEAEyCBO.jpg:small
281 ms
CQ_tFqtUkAAjqxs.jpg:small
284 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
178 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
196 ms
foodsciencesblog.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
foodsciencesblog.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
foodsciencesblog.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foodsciencesblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Foodsciencesblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foodsciencesblog.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Foodsciencesblog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: