4.8 sec in total
1.4 sec
2.2 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Fourthstreetreview content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fourthstreetreview.com
亚洲456在线视频国产|666888作爱网站|亚洲三级片无码91|欧美视频综合sese|午夜亚洲Av无码高潮片在线观看|www.fourthstreetreview.com|91看片午夜在线影院|网站入口在线观看
Visit fourthstreetreview.comWe analyzed Fourthstreetreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
fourthstreetreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value3.6 s
61/100
25%
Value4.8 s
66/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.9 s
88/100
10%
1403 ms
87 ms
133 ms
176 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Fourthstreetreview.com, 12% (11 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Fourthstreetreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 784.6 kB (31%)
2.6 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Fourthstreetreview.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fourthstreetreview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 523.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 523.8 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fourthstreetreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (70%)
83
25
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fourthstreetreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fourthstreetreview.com
1403 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
87 ms
style.css
133 ms
dashicons.min.css
176 ms
css
23 ms
style.css
132 ms
genericons.css
143 ms
jetpack.css
159 ms
jquery.js
155 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
197 ms
responsive-menu.js
192 ms
loader.js
122 ms
vertical-m.css
218 ms
opentag-123939-1670854.js
13 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
6 ms
gprofiles.js
67 ms
wpgroho.js
299 ms
postmessage.js
300 ms
jquery.jetpack-resize.js
301 ms
jquery.inview.js
301 ms
queuehandler.js
301 ms
count.js
302 ms
sharing.js
302 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
ga.js
30 ms
In-Case-You-Missed-IT.jpg
493 ms
Six-Degrees.jpg
546 ms
Eastofeden-e1457476982825.jpg
464 ms
Space-Book-Titles.jpg
425 ms
Dog.jpg
234 ms
image1-1.jpg
308 ms
gpt.js
82 ms
FSR-Watercolor-Banner.jpg
333 ms
Scout-150x150.jpg
346 ms
jane-150x150.jpg
442 ms
search.png
413 ms
loading.gif
441 ms
__utm.gif
131 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
119 ms
46aYWdgz-1oFX11flmyEfYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
120 ms
NbE6ykYuM2IyEwxQxOIi2FFZMcfX2SbzQ69I7OWmkGo.ttf
121 ms
Genericons.svg
503 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
113 ms
ssi-icomoon.woff
402 ms
count.js
116 ms
master.html
113 ms
hovercard.css
59 ms
services.css
112 ms
count.json
103 ms
g.gif
33 ms
graph.facebook.com
157 ms
count.json
99 ms
graph.facebook.com
233 ms
count.json
96 ms
graph.facebook.com
233 ms
count.json
95 ms
graph.facebook.com
244 ms
count.json
94 ms
graph.facebook.com
241 ms
g.gif
60 ms
g.gif
61 ms
g.gif
61 ms
g.gif
62 ms
g.gif
62 ms
g.gif
63 ms
g.gif
62 ms
g.gif
63 ms
g.gif
63 ms
jquery.js
70 ms
quant.js
66 ms
analytics.js
63 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
81 ms
count-data.js
156 ms
g.gif
76 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
105 ms
pixel;r=1105813836;a=p-21iqrI69F1PEY;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1403102270-1458501344285;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458501344284;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffourthstreetreview.com%2F;ogl=type.website%2Ctitle.Fourth%20Street%20Review%2Curl.http%3A%2F%2Ffourthstreetreview%252Ecom%2F%2Csite_name.Fourth%20Street%20Review%2Cimage.https%3A%2F%2Fs0%252Ewp%252Ecom%2Fi%2Fblank%252Ejpg%2Clocale.en_US
69 ms
ads
88 ms
container.html
32 ms
postmessage.js
12 ms
jed.js
25 ms
underscore.min.js
25 ms
tag2
190 ms
jquery.wpcom-proxy-request.js
7 ms
52 ms
osd.js
26 ms
45 ms
likes-rest.js
14 ms
3 ms
fourthstreetreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
fourthstreetreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
fourthstreetreview.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fourthstreetreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Fourthstreetreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fourthstreetreview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fourthstreetreview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: